A well-deserved smack back to some C# zealotry

re: A well-deserved smack back to some C# zealotry

Arnold69 — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 23:34:06 GMT

This approach makes some fairly unconsidered assumptions. ,

re: A well-deserved smack back to some C# zealotry

Punisher 007 — Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:45:03 GMT

oh baby the best is vb.net ........

C# codes are hard and uncomfortable

but vb codes are as powerful as c# codes but more easier

re: A well-deserved smack back to some C# zealotry

Jonathan — Fri, 04 Jul 2008 01:52:44 GMT

with csharp, vb,cplusplus do

try

argue;

finally

free

end;

translation: all of the above comments tell me you should all be using delphi anyway.

re: A well-deserved smack back to some C# zealotry

AX — Fri, 07 Sep 2007 08:27:20 GMT

I think VB.Net and C++.Net are a Complete Couple and C# is Something Suspended Between Them

re: A well-deserved smack back to some C# zealotry

Laurie — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:53:28 GMT

I only WISH I had all of your problems. I came from a .NET shop and preferred VB.NET, although I didn't mind C# because it was similiar to Java. I always liked Java, but thought that its biggest problem was the lack of a good IDE. Then along came .NET and C# which made that mostly moot since C# is so Java-eque.

My problem now is I transferred to a place where they are using LOTUS-FREAKING-NOTES as the application development "language". The worst part is that I can't even find any good resource arguments online to back up my claims that Lotus Notes is garbage and that we should switch to a real programming language like Java or .NET because it's like trying to make an argument in favor of using a car vs. a tricycle. The comparison is so absurd its not even necessary.

I'm still banging my head on the desk from frustration. Using Lotus Notes as an application development language is about as effective and fun as trying to build a house using a pile of toothpicks and a screwdriver. Use C# or VB.NET and count your blessings :(

Universal Accessibility « On The Primacy of Abstraction

Universal Accessibility « On The Primacy of Abstraction — Sat, 09 Dec 2006 00:42:55 GMT

PingBack from http://reroute.wordpress.com/2006/11/29/universal-accessibility/

The Pharmacist and .NET Performance

TrackBack — Fri, 03 Sep 2004 04:06:00 GMT

The Pharmacist and .NET Performance

TrackBack — Fri, 03 Sep 2004 04:05:00 GMT

re: A well-deserved smack back to some C# zealotry

RPS — Wed, 11 Aug 2004 16:51:00 GMT

What are the main arguments for/against case-sensitivity in C#? I like being able to use TitleCase for my methods and properties, and thisCase for my parameters and fields. (I hate using under_stupid_scores for things.

re: A well-deserved smack back to some C# zealotry

David V. Corbin — Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:58:00 GMT

Point #7 is the real interesting one. The [microsoft] developers for Whidbey placed generics as #17 on their priority list. It was #1 on the list for the C# developers.

As (beta) shipment neared, it was apparant that they were NOT going to get to item #17. An uproar [internal to MS] occured, "We have to have generics BECAUSE C# does!".

As a result 6 items which were deemed more important than generics [by user survey, internal analysis, etc] were abandoned for this release!!!!

Now we hav a language wich supports a given feature, NOT because it was a top ranking request, NOT because it was internally deemed technically important, BUT simply to appease a complaint that was marketing related!