<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://weblogs.asp.net/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The DreamLand Express - Charles Oppermann's Software Blog - All Comments</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/chuckop/default.aspx</link><description>Commentary on software design, development and management</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP1 (Build: 20510.895)</generator><item><title>re: Copy message box text to the clipboard</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/chuckop/archive/2004/04/08/110153.aspx#7911492</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:12:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:7911492</guid><dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, that&amp;#39;s really useful!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7911492" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Create New Folder in Explorer – why not easier?</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/chuckop/archive/2005/03/23/395678.aspx#7910483</link><pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:16:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:7910483</guid><dc:creator>mark</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;could someone shake a MS programmer until his brains fall out onto the floor please. In other words why NOT make the button for us?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7910483" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Windows Media Player not adding albums to media library</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/chuckop/archive/2005/03/18/395139.aspx#7819424</link><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 23:15:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:7819424</guid><dc:creator>Waldemar</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Well it looks like y&amp;#39;all got &amp;nbsp;it so I&amp;#39;m in !&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;and let &amp;nbsp;Y&amp;#39;all know later&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7819424" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Balloon Timeout and Notification Duration</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/chuckop/archive/2011/05/20/balloon-timeout-and-notification-duration.aspx#7801322</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 20:51:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:7801322</guid><dc:creator>ChuckOp</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;FYI, after doing some additional reading on Mac OS X, they used to have balloon help, but took it out. &amp;nbsp;It's simply not available anymore.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Contrast that with Microsoft's approach, which often keeps outdated technologies around for legacy purposes. &amp;nbsp;The Briefcase and QuickView technologies come to mind.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7801322" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Balloon Timeout and Notification Duration</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/chuckop/archive/2011/05/20/balloon-timeout-and-notification-duration.aspx#7801317</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 20:47:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:7801317</guid><dc:creator>ChuckOp</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;XP powered the user, Vista took it away, with no good reason&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let's make sure we're talking about the same things here. &amp;nbsp;For balloon notifications, XP allowed applications to specify a timeout. &amp;nbsp;XP imposed a minimum of 10 seconds and a maximum of 30 seconds. &amp;nbsp;I believe the default if not specified is 10 seconds.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As for the reason why Windows Vista &amp;quot;took it away&amp;quot;, I gave you a good reason - to help users who needed ALL notifications to last longer. &amp;nbsp;That's a very good reason.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; A single checkbox too much?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You advocated allowing each notification to be customizable with regard to duration. &amp;nbsp;That customization has to live somewhere either in the application or the operating system&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; If Vista did everything correctly, why did it fail?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I never implied that Vista did everything correctly. &amp;nbsp;However, it was a big step forward for accessibility for people with disabilities due to the growing recogition of the need for system-wide constructs that allow users the ability to inform the OS and appilcations of their desires.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; I hate it when Windows fails and my customers ask for Mac versions of our products &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That sounds like a larger issue than just balloon notifications - which by the way Mac OS X has no concept of. &amp;nbsp;Each application has to code their own status messages and there is no way for a user to inform Mac OS X that they need things to not timeout quickly&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7801317" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Balloon Timeout and Notification Duration</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/chuckop/archive/2011/05/20/balloon-timeout-and-notification-duration.aspx#7801243</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 18:59:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:7801243</guid><dc:creator>Burak KALAYCI</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; most users don&amp;#39;t have a need to customize the notification duration per application.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are users, clueless, exposed to hostile Internet environment. There are users in a controlled environment, who run only a few custom applications. And the applications are run by users, as an extension of themselves where the application is the user.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I wouldn&amp;#39;t consider an application assigning different timeout values to each of its messages too complex.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;XP powered the user, Vista took it away, with no good reason. (I would say the reason could be trying to be a &amp;#39;nanny OS&amp;#39; if this was done deliberately..)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Vista could have switched to this new behavior, but left the option to go back to the powerful XP state via a single checkbox. But Vista being Vista, this didn&amp;#39;t happen :(&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; The UI support to make each notification message customizable&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A single checkbox too much? How many people are not calling Vista bloated right now because of this missing checkbox, I wonder...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If Vista did everything correctly, why did it fail? And remember even pirates complained that they made a loss with their Vista sales...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sorry if my tone is a bit harsh, I&amp;#39;ve invested too much into Windows and I hate it when Windows fails and my customers ask for Mac versions of our products which we don&amp;#39;t have...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7801243" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Mailbag – Flash Player Install and Windows Games – Reversi and Minesweeper</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/chuckop/archive/2011/04/12/mailbag-flash-player-install-and-windows-games-reversi-and-minesweeper.aspx#7800903</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 13:50:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:7800903</guid><dc:creator>ChuckOp</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Sure, in theory the look and feel of Reversi can be updated. &amp;nbsp;It was for Windows XP, but I believe that the Windows XP version did not use the original Reversi game engine.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Having played Reversi for over 20 years now, I can tell you that the original game engine was quite basic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7800903" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Balloon Timeout and Notification Duration</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/chuckop/archive/2011/05/20/balloon-timeout-and-notification-duration.aspx#7800898</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 13:47:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:7800898</guid><dc:creator>ChuckOp</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;@Burak: &amp;nbsp;The reason Windows doesn't support per-application settings for message duration is simple; it's too complex and has dubious benefit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After all, most users don't have a need to customize the notification duration per application.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But if there was such a feature, there would have to be end-user UI to manage it. &amp;nbsp;Just look as the existing &amp;quot;Notification Area Icons&amp;quot; control panel, which lists all the recent icons. &amp;nbsp;In my list, there are icons for applications that I haven't used in quite awhile. &amp;nbsp;Now imagine there was a similar list for all the different notifications - it could be hundreds of entries. &amp;nbsp;I know of one security product that has dozens of different notifications.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The UI support to make each notification message customizable just isn't worth it to support the small set of users who'd want it. &amp;nbsp;In my opinion.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regarding allowing finer grain control. &amp;nbsp;The API that sets the time out accepts milliseconds, so feel free to write an utility that gives the resolution you desire.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The designers of the Ease of Access control panel decided that it better to offer a smaller set of values that cover the majority of values.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7800898" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Mailbag – Flash Player Install and Windows Games – Reversi and Minesweeper</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/chuckop/archive/2011/04/12/mailbag-flash-player-install-and-windows-games-reversi-and-minesweeper.aspx#7798711</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 15:21:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:7798711</guid><dc:creator>Reversi fan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;So can the look of Reversi be modernized and the engine kept the same?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7798711" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Balloon Timeout and Notification Duration</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/chuckop/archive/2011/05/20/balloon-timeout-and-notification-duration.aspx#7798485</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 10:29:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:7798485</guid><dc:creator>Burak KALAYCI</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; The reason for ignoring the application-supplied timeout is so that users can gain more control over their working environment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, what about users who want to give the control to the application they run? (Which are the tools actually powering the user).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I mean, what stopped Vista guys having a checkbox that said &amp;#39;Let the applications decide for each message&amp;#39; (even if they would choose not having it checked by default - which would be the right thing to do IMO).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; The default value is 5 seconds, and can be set to 7, 15, 30, 60, and 300 seconds&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More power to the user, especially those who want to set it to 8 seconds, or 20, or 45...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You may defend the Vista way, but not having an XP compatible option, IMO, is not defensible...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7798485" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>
