Fabrice's weblog - All Comments

re: Rethrowing exceptions and preserving the full call stack trace

atconway — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:33:23 GMT

There was an older comment from 'Jose' about having some issues in VB.NET. I took the directly converted C# -> VB.NET code and tested it. It worked as descibed with no issues. I had code with and without the call to the Sub, and my exception log would show the proper line number with stack trace or omit it as excpected. This is a well explained entry on this topic, thank you. The VB.NET code I used is below:

Private Shared Sub PreserveStackTrace(ByVal exObj As Exception)

Dim preserveStackTrace As MethodInfo = GetType(Exception).GetMethod("InternalPreserveStackTrace", BindingFlags.Instance Or BindingFlags.NonPublic)

preserveStackTrace.Invoke(exObj, Nothing)

End Sub

Ressources utiles pour la r??alisation de wireframes | Deldie

Ressources utiles pour la r??alisation de wireframes | Deldie — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:20:29 GMT

Pingback from Ressources utiles pour la r??alisation de wireframes | Deldie

Memory leaks and profiling with .Net

Florian's weblog — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:43:53 GMT

I wrote some moths ago an article about the GC and highlighted some particularities (unsafe and unmanaged

re: Forcing event unsubscription

Fabrice Marguerie — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:34:26 GMT

VB is hiding things so much, that I don't know if it's possible. I don't see how.

re: New article: How to detect and avoid memory and resources leaks in .NET applications

Florian DITTGEN — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:50:23 GMT

Best article I read about this subject. Thanks!

re: Why LINQ will succeed

scaleprogrammers — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:45:33 GMT

LINQ will succeed for use in I think anything but SQL for now. Lets say I want to search an array or something or some XML, Great!, but not for SQL. Deployment is difficult with linq when you have to deploy a client application and change the connection information. Also database updates a lot of times also require a reinstall of the application where a good plan using stored procedures and readers etc... gives a lot more flexibility.

Events, references, garbage collecting, memory leaks and weak delegates

Fabrice's weblog — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:51:20 GMT

I was playing with services and containers, as part of my implementation of Inversion of Control . All

re: Events, references, garbage collecting, memory leaks and weak delegates

Fabrice Marguerie — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:50:48 GMT

I cover the same subject and much more in an article: weblogs.asp.net/.../article-detect-avoid-memory-leaks.aspx

re: New article: How to detect and avoid memory and resources leaks in .NET applications

Patrick Smacchia — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:16:35 GMT

Excellent articles, thanks Fabrice, 2 thumbs up!

re: Forcing event unsubscription

Jigar — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 06:59:13 GMT

How to set shared events to null (in case of vb.net) in .Net 2.0?