Omer van Kloeten's .NET Zen - All Comments

???????? ????????????: ???????? ?????????????? ???????????? ?????????????? | ?????????? ????????

Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:30:50 GMT

Pingback from ???????? ????????????: ???????? ?????????????? ???????????? ?????????????? | ?????????? ????????

Let SQL Server Tell You Which Indexes to Rebuild

DotNetBurner - SQL Server — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:59:30 GMT

DotNetBurner - burning hot .net content

12/09 « Gamdt's Blog

12/09 « Gamdt's Blog — Sat, 12 Sep 2009 09:39:04 GMT

Pingback from 12/09 « Gamdt's Blog

re: ContentPresenter Is Not Set When Using a ControlTemplate for a ContentControl

Brent — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 02:45:03 GMT

Thanks taking the time to post this. I can't imagine how much time you saved me...

re: The Office 2007 Ribbon UI - My Impressions

Darren — Fri, 24 Jul 2009 03:40:44 GMT

I simply hate this toolbar/ribbon replacement.

It’s a waste of time, horribly disorganized and has the complete opposite effect on the user interface then what is described by Microsoft.

It uses far to much space. I don’t know why I need to see a 96×64 px image of a chart with both a label and description all the time.

Additionally you cannot relocate the stupid thing at all. So for example you place the toolbars you use on the left side (which I personally do because I perfere more vertical space) you cannot do it at all.

The simply fact they did not make this “optional” or customizable is insane. The entire development and planning group should be fired.

The ordering of the items is also retarded. The Top contains an “Area”, which then has “sub areas” which are labeled across the bottom for some reason, then the 3rd level is above with both a mixed vertical and horizontal ordering. Then most of these still end up with a Menu? Your eyes simply do not track this rediculas order naturally in the same tree like way of a normal menu.

Darren (.Net Developer, Embarassed by Office 2007 changes)

re: Extension Methods Roundup: IndicesWhere, TakeEvery, Distinct

David — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:07:59 GMT

I know this is a year old, but I stumbled upon this while trying to figure out how I can get Distinct() to take a lambda expression and this fit my needs perfectly. Well done Omer and thanks for posting this information.

re: Linq to SQL: ChangeConflictException With "WHERE 0 = 1"

Borissov — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:42:43 GMT

Thanks a lot, I spent almost a day seeking for the root cause, and actually it was a NULL/Not NULL difference...

Cheers

re: My View of C# 4.0

non-believer — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 18:25:55 GMT

"The compiler can very easily infer the fact that your interface is either input-only or output-only and mark it as such for you."

I love broad, uneducated statements. How can the compiler do that?

In fact, it cannot. I think Eric Lippert explained why in his blog. I'll let you google (or bing if you prefer) yourself, you should do your homework because writing.

"Although Variance is implicit, the others are explicit"

Variance doesn't exisit itself... Only Co- and Contra-variance concepts do (well, Invariant does too, but it's pretty useless). So I wonder how it can be implicit, while the other twos aren't. Do you know what you're talking about? Please have a look a wikipedia for the definition of those: en.wikipedia.org/.../Covariance_and_contravariance_(computer_science)

Silverlight MultiBindings, How to attached mutiple bindings to a single property. – Colin Eberhardt’s Adventures in WPF

Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:54:02 GMT

Pingback from Silverlight MultiBindings, How to attached mutiple bindings to a single property. – Colin Eberhardt’s Adventures in WPF

re: Linq to SQL: ChangeConflictException With "WHERE 0 = 1"

Andrey Tagaew — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:51:41 GMT

Thanks Man!!!

I want to add that it works, no matter of whether your real table in db has more columns then in your model.

It fails if some of that columns has invalid null/not null state in comparing with real db