Thomas Vestergaards stuff of doom - All Comments

re: Estimating projects, Part 1 / 3 - Define user stories

hooher tod — Mon, 05 Sep 2011 23:42:20 GMT

Yes there should realize the reader to RSS my feed to RSS commentary, quite simply

re: Web forms vs. MVC

JonathanWood — Mon, 21 Mar 2011 06:19:01 GMT

Heh, I've been programming over 20 years and using WebForms for the past several and have just ordered my first book on MVC. Yes, I won't miss the runat tags, and I definitely will not miss the large viewstate and bloated HTML. However, it's still to early to say what I will miss.

re: Web forms vs. MVC

ThomasVestergaard — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 07:50:59 GMT

That is partially true Morgan.

If you want to access form values through the aspx code behind, you still need the runat="server" tag.

The ViewData dictionary is always at your service in the aspx code behind, no matter if you use runat="server" or not.

re: Web forms vs. MVC

Morgan Cheng — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 01:47:51 GMT

I believe that in ASP.NET MVC View, you still need the runtat="server" tags. Otherwise, you cannot extract value from ViewData dynamically.

Web forms vs. MVC - Thomas Vestergaards stuff of doom

Web forms vs. MVC - Thomas Vestergaards stuff of doom — Sun, 07 Dec 2008 16:06:14 GMT

Pingback from Web forms vs. MVC - Thomas Vestergaards stuff of doom

Estimating projects, Part 1 / 3 - Define user stories - Thomas Vestergaards stuff of doom

Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:32:08 GMT

Pingback from Estimating projects, Part 1 / 3 - Define user stories - Thomas Vestergaards stuff of doom

Arjan`s World » LINKBLOG for November 26, 2008

Arjan`s World » LINKBLOG for November 26, 2008 — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:45:24 GMT

Pingback from Arjan`s World » LINKBLOG for November 26, 2008

re: Conquer dependency injection and MVC modelbinding issues

brady gaster — Tue, 25 Nov 2008 18:00:04 GMT

Thanks for the link, partner. I like your approach in this post. Good stuff.