Comicality Inflation

 My post the other day (Computer Programmer Inflation) got me thinking of another type of inflation that I've observed over the years: Comicality Inflation. Like other types of inflation, it's not as if things have gotten funnier, it’s just the terms we use to describe them.

 

Back in the day (and I'm talking the day; as in, before electricity and all that), if a friend sent us a letter that we found entertaining, we would simply compliment it when we penned our reply: Archibald, I must concede your quip about poor Rutherford’s embarrassing gaffe was quite witty and remarkably entertaining.

 

Thankfully, those days are long gone, replaced by the ever-so-simple (though dreadfully less elegant) onomatopoeic interjection "haha" (and it's cousins, "hehe", "hoho", etc). One of the great features of "haha" is that it is an expandojective: the intensity of its meaning is proportional to its length.

  • ha - mildly amusing, possibly causing a very soft chuckle
  • haha - funny, causing at a minimum a chuckle, but most likely a snort
  • ...
  • a-hahahahahaha - busting out in full-blown laughter requiring a pre-laughter breath (hence, the "a-")

By the way, if anyone knows the proper term for such a word, please advise. It's not as if "haha" is the only expandojective. There’s "aaagh", "aarrg", "reeeaaaaly", "zzz", and so on. These magical fantastic words truly need their own category.

 

Anyway, it would seem that "haha" would be the perfect way of indicating the comicality of something you read.  After all, it expands as things get funnier and it even has lots of room for personalization ("ho-ha-ha","teehehe",etc). Alas, it is not; some one had to come along and create the acronym "LOL".

 

On its own, I don't think that LOL (Laugh Out Loud) is a terrible thing. After all, there's no official "ha" scale and it's quite hard to tell if "hahaha" means "I laughed out loud" or "I had a series of snickers."  It's the abuse and extension of LOL that really offends me.

 

First, let’s consider the abuse. How many times have you seen people reply with "LOL" and you know, for a fact, that what you wrote wasn’t possibly that funny? And if you think exaggerative flattery is excusable, consider the typical teenage instant message conversation:

princessGurl1924: heya becca, hows it goin, lol
angelKitty77: omg, lol it's goin pretty good lol. u??
princessGurl1924: lol good good!~!!

If I knew anyone who laughed that much in real life, I would suggest that they have some serious mental disorder. Or that they are high on some cocktail of illicit narcotics.

 

I know that I'm not alone in this observation. I've noticed that quite a few people have started to differentiate between LOL-funny and Laugh-Out-Loud-funny by replacing the latter with the absurdly redundant "LLOL" (Literally Laugh Out Loud). I swear, if we ever begin to figuratively LLOL, I will have no choice but to become a Luddite.

 

I’d have to say that the extensions of LOL offend me the most. Let's consider the most prevalent:

 

ROFL (Rolling On the Floor Laughing) - I've seen a lot of funny stuff in my day, and, let me tell you, I'm a laugher. But I have never seen anything that was so funny that I dropped to the floor in a fit of uncontrollable laughter. And if you ever have, it certainly wasn’t while reading something on the internet.

 

LMAO (Laughing My Ass Off) - Some might say that this is not fair game because the colloquialism "laughing my ass off" had existed prior to the Internet. No less, I still consider the acronymization to be a direct result of LOL.

 

ROFLMAO (Rolling On the Floor Laughing My Ass Off) - A total unnecessary expansion of an expansion. Since when was an uncontrollable fit of laughter causing one to drop to the floor *not* the most extreme reaction to humor possible? And what, precisely, is the difference between laughing while rolling on the floor and laughing your ass off while rolling on the floor? How possibly could one distinguish between the two?

 

ROFLOL (Rolling On the Floor Laughing Out Loud) - I'm guessing this falls somewhere between ROFL and ROLFMAO. But it’s just another pointless expansion. We already know that there is no difference between ROFL and ROFLMAO, but think about what ROFLOL implies. Someone who is rolling on the floor in laughter isn't doing so audibly, just quietly rolling around on the floor, laughing to themselves.

 

LOLOLOL (???) - I don't even know what this is. Laugh Out Loud Out Loud Out Loud? Laugh Out Laugh Out Loud Out Loud? How exactly did an acronym become an expandojective? It's "words" like this that make me long the good-ole-days before "haha" was created.

 

I know we've all used these new-aged acronyms (except LOLOLOL, I hope). And I know we probably won't stop. But, at least consider this rant next time you reply with ROFLMAO; it just may just enhance your fits of laughter while you're rolling around on the floor.

Published Tuesday, May 03, 2005 7:27 PM by Alex Papadimoulis

Comments

Tuesday, May 03, 2005 7:40 PM by Jason Mauss

# re: Comicality Inflation

HAHAHAHAHA OMG THIS ARTIKUL IS TEH FUNNAY!!! LOL!!

U R TEH ESS-EMM-AR-TEE!! ROFLMFAO!!!111Shift+One!!

LOLLERSAKTES!! haahhaahahahaha
Wednesday, May 04, 2005 1:05 AM by Jon Limjap

# re: Comicality Inflation

Don't worry too much about the LOL acronyms. Consider the internet chatting problem in my country aggravated by a cultural addiction to SMS messaging:

h! hw r u? i rily hd fn lst nyt. dat Jon dud was so funi lol. hs jk abt d...

I think you get what I'm trying to say.
Wednesday, May 04, 2005 4:28 AM by TrackBack

# Computer Programmer Inflation

Alex Papadimoulis (he of DailyWTF fame) has posted a couple of v.funny articles recently:

Computer...
Wednesday, May 04, 2005 9:17 AM by Hank Miller

# re: Comicality Inflation

ROFL, LMAO, and ROFLMAO have all existed longer than LOL as far as I can tell. I encountered all 3 on UseNet many years before I encountered LOL - on irc.

I think this is a culture issue. Where you are communicating indicates what you use.

Those on UseNet tend to use ROFL and the like, but never LOL and rarely haha. (ha is generarlly used to indicate you think the position is so wrong it is almost funny to see someone arguing it, not an indication of a joke that was enjoyed)

LOL is something I have only encountered on irc, where the others were rarely used. (I have not been a regular on irc in something like 5 years, I can't tell how the culture has changed since then)

The term for haha is Onomatopoeia - a word that sounds like it is pronounced. see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onomatopoeia
Wednesday, May 04, 2005 9:57 AM by Jakeypoo

# re: Comicality Inflation

Thank god I have a wireless keyboard! I pulled it off the table and am typing on it now (with surprising precision) while I ROFLMAO at your article.
Wednesday, May 04, 2005 10:50 AM by Katja Bergman

# SQ

That's all I want to add to this discussion: SQ

SQ = Smiling Quietly...
Wednesday, May 04, 2005 10:55 AM by bob

# re: Comicality Inflation

heh, you forgot to include roflmmfao...
Wednesday, May 04, 2005 1:20 PM by Jason

# re: Comicality Inflation

Well, these words are all onomatopoeias ( http://www.tnellen.com/cybereng/lit_terms/onomatopoeia.html ) but I think the phenomenon of expanding them to show intensity are truly expandojectives. lol
Wednesday, May 04, 2005 1:24 PM by Jason

# re: Comicality Inflation

DAMN IT I should have read all the comments... Someone already mentioned "onamatopoeia". I guess I was just too excited to show what I've learned with Verbal Advantage®.
Wednesday, May 04, 2005 1:29 PM by Alex Papadimoulis

# re: Comicality Inflation

Some expandojectives are onomatopoeias and some are not; there's an interesection between the classifications, but no subsets.

expandojectives that are not onomatopoeias:
- cooooooold (like, -50 degrees cold)
- cooooooool (few steps above the Fonz cool)
- ccccrrraazzzyy (prices so low you want to explode)

And you certainly can't just expand any subjective adjective:
- transluuuuuuuuuuuucent
- hooooooooooooot (unlike cool/cold)
Thursday, May 05, 2005 4:33 AM by Mayo

# re: Comicality Inflation

\\o oOo o//
Thursday, May 05, 2005 8:45 AM by samuel

# re: Comicality Inflation

oh hell yes this is one hell of my expriance. and it is realy funy LOL.probably i am the one using this word so often but pal, i don't have mental disorder . i like your aricle i didn't expect that i'm gonna clash with this site. just pop in this site to get detailed information about inflation for my economics project it's realy funny though LOL again!! pisss out!!!
Friday, May 06, 2005 12:03 AM by TrackBack

# Robin Curry

Robin Curry
Friday, May 06, 2005 8:02 AM by Luzk

# re: Comicality Inflation

I couldn't agree more! But what I hate even more than people (mis)using LOL etc, are the ones SAYING LOL etc.
Friday, May 06, 2005 10:26 AM by Jakeypoo

# re: Comicality Inflation

PrincessGurl and AngelKitty sound pretty hot.
Thursday, June 15, 2006 12:40 PM by Ringo

# re: Comicality Inflation

Having just posted ROFLMAO I'm now truly ROFLMAO ... some of you guys are too funny ...!
Sunday, August 27, 2006 2:40 PM by Jeorge Lukasing

# re: Comicality Inflation

Very many thanks for a good work. Nice and useful. Like it!

Thursday, September 14, 2006 7:11 PM by J

# re: Comicality Inflation

I've usually heard LOL refer to "Lots of Laughs", so even though LOLOLOLOL is RDS (Really Damn Stupid) it could still make sense as Lots Of Lots Of Lots of ... Laughs

Monday, September 25, 2006 7:51 AM by nand

# re: Comicality Inflation

When I started using modems, BBS's, chats, Internet and IRC in 1994 and 1995, I was explained it was embarrassing to laugh out loud alone, so LOL was a warning to the typer that he has gone too far, because now the reader is laughing out loud, possibly embarrassing him/herself to family members or neighbors. I was explained LOL is Laughing Out Loud (too loud, alone, sitting on a computer).

Tuesday, October 10, 2006 6:44 AM by Laugher

# re: Comicality Inflation

ROTFLOLSHIFTMSHS

Seriously though, they annoy me too as they are used to liberally to mean anythingf, and many of tmhe too extreme to apply usefully.

Monday, February 12, 2007 11:48 AM by wanderer

# re: Comicality Inflation

You forgot..

Lmfao

and

Roflmfao

Also..Lets discuss the way people use and = & in a tottaly stupidified way..

as such;

So I saw that girl the other day && she was wearing that coat!

I mean its unneccesary to be using &+&

That just basically makes you go....'the other day and and....'

Its true..The internet makes everyone go a little more stupid by the day.

Monday, February 26, 2007 3:50 PM by genix

# re: Comicality Inflation

Its like how people used to say: "lol" but so many people say that without so much as even a glimmer of expression on their faces in real life that some people started saying "you made me LOL IRL!".

And then so many were saying that but not actually doing it, that posts appeared with things like "You ***! You made me actually laugh so hard i spilt my coffee >_<"

But even spillages and other comparisons to real life no longer made the post seem any more valid, that i have seen people take it one step further trying to make the post more believable:

"hahahah! that was so funny i just spat my coke out all over my keyboard. this is the 3rd keyboard ive ruined this week"

Thursday, April 29, 2010 7:15 PM by Graco Nautilus 3 In 1 Car Seat

# Graco Nautilus 3 In 1 Car Seat

Good post I have appreciated reading this as well as I have refrred your post to my list of related blogs check it out www.graconautilus3in1carseats.com/.../graco-nautilus-3-in-1-multiuse-car-seat-bravo

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(required) 
(optional)
(required)