The "Steve Rule" Proved True Again

The trouble with data… » The Steve Rule

The trouble with data… » The Steve Rule — Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:26:38 GMT

Pingback from The trouble with data… » The Steve Rule

This Blog Needs No Name | February | 2009

This Blog Needs No Name | February | 2009 — Sun, 08 Feb 2009 21:58:27 GMT

Pingback from This Blog Needs No Name | February | 2009

re: The "Steve Rule" Proved True Again

chris christmas — Thu, 15 May 2008 16:17:08 GMT

the real wtf is that all 7 of the chrisses are women. Also 90% of the women in IT are named Suresh.

re: The "Steve Rule" Proved True Again

kukanov — Wed, 03 Oct 2007 22:59:18 GMT

I love you people

George

re: The "Steve Rule" Proved True Again

Jeff Atwood — Thu, 05 May 2005 13:37:00 GMT

Julia Lerman calls this the "Brian" rule based on TechEd 2004 speakers..

http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000282.html

re: The "Steve Rule" Proved True Again

Jon Limjap — Wed, 04 May 2005 04:59:00 GMT

In my previous job, when we lost our last female, our operations guys created a policy to hire only female On-the-job-trainees for the programming team.

None of us complained. We even got to hire a female developer after that.

re: The "Steve Rule" Proved True Again

Steve — Tue, 03 May 2005 13:44:00 GMT

At my last company we had 1 female developer and I was one of the two Steves (although the other one was moving out of development and into management).

re: The "Steve Rule" Proved True Again

Baloney — Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:55:00 GMT

Our team of 10 developers has 3 women and NO duplicate guys names!

This must be the exception that prooves the rule.

re: The "Steve Rule" Proved True Again

Eric Vitiello — Wed, 27 Apr 2005 18:53:00 GMT

Another interesting observation is the number of programmers named "Eric" that have a mustache:

http://www.catb.org/~esr/ecsl/

re: The "Steve Rule" Proved True Again

keeper40k — Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:30:00 GMT

I don't know about Kristian and Gwen, but could it be that that is a boy named Sue?