Miscellaneous Debris

Avner Kashtan's Frustrations and Exultations
Screencasts vs. Whitepapers

A few weeks ago, Lawrence Liu (a senior technical PM and community lead for Sharepoint at Microsoft) linked to a few screencasts for learning how to use various features in MOSS2007. In that entry, he mentioned how screecasts are more effective and efficient in training and learning to use a new piece of software. Me, I'm a bit divided about them:

1) Screencasts are great for getting a hands-on view of the system, that's true. A picture is worth a thousand words, and a movie is worth about 30 frames per second. I know software authors that have replaced the help file completely with a small Camtasia screencast. This, of course, only works for simple programs with few use-cases.

2) As Lawrence mentions, most screencasts are way, way too long. It's understandable - when speaking you want to be as clear and understandable as possible. Too often it turns into a slow, repetitive lecture. To illustrate: last month Microsoft Israel held a Developer Academy conference to give lectures on new Vista dev topics. I squeezed in one Office 2007 talk. Because I was too worried about being clear and understood, I ended up repeating myself. Even a completely non-technical listener who just came in to hear me speak (yes, indeed, it was my mother) said she got the point already and that I should get on with it.

My point? Too many screencasts are way too long. Jan Tielens' SmartPart (and sons) is a wonderful web-part to use and to learn from, but the screencast takes 16 minutes to describe what the 2-page readme.txt contains.

3) Screencasts are mostly a solution to learn the how, not the why. I can use Lawrence's screencasts to learn how to add a library to the Records Center, but I would have found that out myself with little effort. What I would really want right now is a good set of whitepapers to understand the goals of the Records Center and how to use, not abuse it in my solutions.

4) A final tip for screencasts and webcasts - when using Windows Media Player you can speed up playback without affecting the pitch. This is to mitigate slow lecturers and needless repetition. It might require downloading the video locally first. Speeding it up to 140% is usually perfectly understandable.
On my Media Player 9, it's under View -> Enhancements -> Play Speed. Enjoy.

Published Thursday, February 15, 2007 4:10 PM by Avner Kashtan

Comments

# re: Screencasts vs. Whitepapers@ Thursday, February 15, 2007 9:28 AM

Speeding it up to implies a low signal to noise ratio.

I am tempted to say I can read "about a hundred times" faster than they can present stuff in a video, but its probably less than 100.

Videos, at least the kinds we are seeing at present, are no kind of replacement for actual documentation.

AndrewSeven

# re: Screencasts vs. Whitepapers@ Thursday, February 15, 2007 10:09 AM

I agree that screencasts are particularly annoying.  They're ok for an initial understanding of how something works, but that's it.

What's particularly annoying about the screencasts, is that they seldom give you a place to download their sample code.

At least with a written example, you can run it yourself and better understand how it works.

The Other Steve

# re: Screencasts vs. Whitepapers@ Thursday, February 15, 2007 11:08 AM

Camtasia offers very simple methods for Screen-cast authors to go back and chop out any non-beneficial sections.

From what I've seen most of the hour long Screen-casts can have at least 17 minutes trimmed off, which is a lot closer to the 10 minutes most everyone will devote to one.

Mark Wisecarver

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(required) 
(optional)
(required)