<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://weblogs.asp.net/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Being a responsible open source developer</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/bsimser/archive/2006/12/19/being-a-responsible-open-source-developer.aspx</link><description>First off, let's start this post by saying I think there are a few key points in computer history where things turned. The introduction of the GUI (even though both Apple and Microsoft just build on what Xerox did); the Internet; Object Oriented Languages;</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP1 (Build: 20510.895)</generator><item><title>re: Being a responsible open source developer</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/bsimser/archive/2006/12/19/being-a-responsible-open-source-developer.aspx#1359965</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 04:28:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:1359965</guid><dc:creator>AC</dc:creator><author>AC</author><description>&lt;p&gt;Good commentary Bil... find myself agreeing with many if not all your points.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1359965" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Being a responsible open source developer</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/bsimser/archive/2006/12/19/being-a-responsible-open-source-developer.aspx#1278338</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 09:29:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:1278338</guid><dc:creator>FransBouma</dc:creator><author>FransBouma</author><description>&lt;p&gt;That 120+ pages document about how to build a UI is pretty silly, when you consider the irony that ALL Office 2007 applications look completely different: Outlook doesn't use the ribbon but has new controls for menu/buttonbar (colors are different) and for example publisher has old-skool office 2003 menu's/button bars. Word has a ribbon and Excel has too. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Didn't they read their own document? So why does anyone else have to obey to their 'standard'?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;About Dare's screenshots: IMHO that's exactly why the ribbon was created: to get previews of what an action would do so I don't see why these are bad at all, they IMHO match perfectly with the intention of the ribbon. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course the buttons are way too big, but that's with every button on the ribbon. If you look closely to what the ribbon really is, it's just a menu with big buttons, so you STILL flip through the menus (tabs on the ribbon in this case) and have to hunt for a feature. In short: it doesn't make things more productive (I don't find it easier in Word, and I'm using word quite a lot lately for design docs), just different. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1278338" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>