My frustrations with MVVM in Silverlight

There is no doubt that the MVVM pattern offers a clean separation of concern for building testable user interfaces with WPF and Silverlight.  This pattern relies on the data binding support in those two technologies for mapping an existing model class (the view model) to the different parts of the UI or view.

Someone would say, If you want to develop more testable and maintainable applications that can evolve in the long run, MVVM is definitely the way to go in Silverlight, but wait, is that a good decision to make when something that should take a couple of hours instead takes a day with MVVM ?.  

In my case, I always want to do the things right, so MVVM was the approach I decided to use in some outgoing developments with Silverlight. In used MVVM in the past with WPF with no problems, so I thought it will be the same thing on Silverlight.

After having worked around six months with the technology, I have to admit that I got frustrated with many of the limitations of I found for implementing MVVM with many of the existing controls. In the way I see it, many of them were definitely developed to support simple RAD scenarios with code behind, but not for scenarios with data templates and bindings.   

I wrote a couple of posts in the past with some workarounds to support data binding in some of the existing controls (TreeView and ContextMenu), which definitely were not something trivial to find and required investing many hours of research and testing to understand how the things worked under the hood. To give an example of how simple things can become really hard to accomplish with MVVM, I recently came across this thread about implementing MVVM in the Tab Control while trying to do the same on my side. Using a converter for binding a model to the control was not the answer I expected to hear, and sounded like a dirty hack to me. The same thing can be achieved in WPF with data templates, which is a more natural way to do things with this model.

The only thing I can say is that MVVM works well for simple scenarios and common controls like a dropdown list, but you will probably find a hard time trying to use this pattern in Silverlight unless you know exactly what the limitations are and the different workarounds you can use.

Comments

No Comments