Christian Nagel's OneNotes - All Comments

re: .NET 2.0: Database Independent ADO.NET

JXL99 — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 22:25:55 GMT

This is classic fragmented identity management, operationalized in a real-world technical system. ,

re: Creating Word Documents with XSLT

keshav — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 08:45:28 GMT

can we create XML like

<Title><i>XML Web Services Programming</i></Title>

so that "XML Web Services Programming" look like as

itellic.

re: Interface Inheritance

TamusJRoyce — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:12:28 GMT

abstract class in vb .net is called MustInherit, and therefore

"Such a scenario seems not possible with VB"

is not only possible, but identical in functionality with C#.

The main point in this article has overlooked this:

public interface IA

Sub A()

End IA

public mustinherit class XA

Public Sub A()

End Sub

End Class

public class X

Inherits XA

Implements IA

End Class

re: C++/CLI Value Types and Memory Location

Miguel — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:48:44 GMT

I have another question as well:

3. If Value classes can be allocated on the stack, on the managed heap or on the native heap

and

Ref Classes can be allocated on the stack or on the managed heap,

then

what is the purpose of having Value Classes and Ref Classes ? (i.e., I was thinking up to now that a Value Class is used when you want to put the class on the stack and a Ref class is used when you want to put the class on the managed heap. Maybe this thinking is completely wrong).

BR,

Miguel.

re: C++/CLI Value Types and Memory Location

Miguel — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:34:54 GMT

Hello,

Thanks for this nice short article. May I ask two questions ?

1. MyData^ d3 = gcnew MyData();

d3->Simple = 33;

In this case, MyData is created on the managed heap - is this correct ?

2. Are ref classes always created on the managed heap (unless they are created as a local variable as you mentioned in one of your other articles) ? Or can they be created on the native heap ?

Thanks and regards,

Miguel

Knowing .NET » Blog Archive » Don’t do this with SQL

Knowing .NET » Blog Archive » Don’t do this with SQL — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:58:14 GMT

Pingback from Knowing .NET » Blog Archive » Don’t do this with SQL

re: Properties with C++/CLI

Vic — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:30:13 GMT

Thanks! That's exactly what I was looking for at the moment I found your answer above.

One little note:

The 'get' function definition requires a return type preceding the namespace, but otherwise, works like a champ!

re: Access Modifiers: C++/CLI vs C# vs VB

Justin — Fri, 15 May 2009 15:29:43 GMT

No problemo, just wanted to try to open a line of communication with these all too coincidental ghosts that are haunting me... but I'm thinking they may actually be angels, dear grandmothers watching over me from on high...

re: Filling DataSets with Multiple Tables

Baljeet — Tue, 12 May 2009 06:18:58 GMT

How bind this dataset with dropdownlist

re: Access Modifiers: C++/CLI vs C# vs VB

boltonss — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 08:33:54 GMT

vb.net access specifiers

vb.net-informations.com/.../vb.net_access_specifiers.htm

C# Access Specifiers

csharp.net-informations.com/.../csharp-access-specifiers.htm