<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://weblogs.asp.net/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Chad Osgood's Blog - All Comments</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/cosgood/default.aspx</link><description>The manifest of a geek microcosm</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP1 (Debug Build: 20510.895)</generator><item><title>re: Internet C++: Internet Virtual Machine</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/cosgood/archive/2003/05/26/7602.aspx#6640110</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 11:23:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:6640110</guid><dc:creator>Sondhi Chakraborty</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Seems to be amazing stuff ... the C++ Object Model is not a proprietary one, is far more mature and popular, and best of all, a more encompassing model as compared to Java and C#.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Good work Bob! Hope this becomes a commercially recognized some day!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6640110" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Using the RegularExpressionValidator for validating length of text | hamang.net</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/cosgood/archive/2003/05/06/6604.aspx#6629656</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:10:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:6629656</guid><dc:creator>Using the RegularExpressionValidator for validating length of text | hamang.net</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Pingback from &amp;nbsp;Using the RegularExpressionValidator for validating length of text | hamang.net&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6629656" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: How would you move mount Fuji?</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/cosgood/archive/2003/06/15/8729.aspx#6416181</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:21:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:6416181</guid><dc:creator>Adam Jones</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Can you please see our story of the FUJI Challenge 4 in 24 Hours!!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please check out www.fujiclimb.com&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We are planning to climb Mt Fuji 4 times in 24 hours!!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6416181" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: PDF Generation in .NET</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/cosgood/archive/2003/04/11/5417.aspx#6376290</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:45:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:6376290</guid><dc:creator>peteratoce</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Another (free) PDF library is PDFsharp at &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.pdfsharp.com/PDFsharp/"&gt;www.pdfsharp.com/PDFsharp&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6376290" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Boolean naming conventions</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/cosgood/archive/2003/03/04/3356.aspx#6169636</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:50:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:6169636</guid><dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Jim Davis: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That's hungarian notation, a surely now outdated name convention, which I'm not in favour of. &amp;nbsp;The purpose of a variable should be obvious in the way it's named, &amp;nbsp;thus I use a mixture of camel case. &amp;nbsp;A prefix of &amp;quot;bln&amp;quot; still doesn't give a clue to the purpose of the variable, even though in your case it may seem obvious.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My opinion anyway..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6169636" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Interactive regular expression constructors</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/cosgood/archive/2003/06/19/9013.aspx#6093137</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 07:22:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:6093137</guid><dc:creator>sha</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Chad, for these tools. Really cool!!!! Regex-coach is superb.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6093137" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: RegularExpressionValidator woes and the semantics of dot</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/cosgood/archive/2003/05/06/6604.aspx#6076287</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 00:15:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:6076287</guid><dc:creator>T Jackson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;As a followup to my post,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The issue I have above, seems to relate to the difference in the way a NewLine is handled client side in a browser and how ASP.NET/Windows handles the NewLine character(s) on the server.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Client side in a browser, the NewLine character sequence seems to consist of only one character.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, server-side the NewLine is counted as two characters (I assume CR and LF separately).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This difference has caused a few problems for me and am still in the progress of finding a decent solution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6076287" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: RegularExpressionValidator woes and the semantics of dot</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/cosgood/archive/2003/05/06/6604.aspx#6076020</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 22:45:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:6076020</guid><dc:creator>T Jackson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the article.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And thanks for an alternative Randal, however, I tried to your expression but it failed to work correctly apply the character limit under certain circumstances.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For example if I use the expression you provided /^[\s\S]{0,500}$/ &amp;nbsp;on 503 characters which includes 3 carriage return line feeds, the expression validates this as acceptable. It seems not to count the carriage returns in applying the character limit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just thought I would share that with you.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6076020" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: PDF Generation in .NET</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/cosgood/archive/2003/04/11/5417.aspx#5656788</link><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:21:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:5656788</guid><dc:creator>Master Foon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Man you just better shut the hell up before I come over there and put the hurt on you. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5656788" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>More on hungarian notation and field prefixing</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/cosgood/archive/2003/05/26/7582.aspx#5343330</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:00:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:5343330</guid><dc:creator>More on hungarian notation and field prefixing</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Pingback from &amp;nbsp;More on hungarian notation and field prefixing&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5343330" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>