Dave Burke - Freelance .NET Developer specializing in Online Communities

A freelance .NET Developer

Sharepoint Beef #1: URLs too long to open Web Folder

This Sharepoint Beef also serves as an introduction to The Series.  As such, I've been a SPS admin now for two years.  Bottom line is I think that WSS/WEBDAV backend rocks, which is all I wish to say at the moment about Sharepoint Server.  I should also say I'm still using SPS 1.0 and debating whether to move operations to W2K3 Sharepoint Services or SPS 2.0.  More on that later.

Regarding the beef, this is my biggest one.  You want to open a Sharepoint folder using a URL so you can use all that sweet enhanced folder document profiling and versioning, and you get

But don't fret, there's a KB article on it. 

RESOLUTION

To resolve this behavior, click to clear the Open as Web Folder check box, or type a shorter address.

“Oh, gosh!  THANKS!!!!“

Then there are those poor schmucks like myself trying to build systems around the limitation as this and the other (of many) google threads attest, with responses like “this will be fixed in IE6.0, or the IE 5.5 SP2.”

I'm so embarrassed by imposing this limitation on my users that I say Microsoft imposed the 100-character URL length due to security concerns.

In two years I'm been doing my SPS admin gig I have never seen any response as to why this limitation exists nor why Microsoft has not addressed it.  My singular hope is that someday I see a fix or someone explains why we decided to stop opening folders when a URL reaches100 characters.

Posted: Jan 07 2004, 10:13 AM by daveburke | with 6 comment(s)
Filed under:

Comments

James Edelen said:

Unfortuniatly, now that SPS 2.0 is out, I highly doubt Microsoft will be issuing any new features for version 1.

You may want to look into SPS v2 becasue the first beef may be allieviated as SPS document libraries are parsed as UNC paths through the Web Folders client. I don't know that the 100 character limit is imposed, but based on the structure of your sites/libraries, it should be less of a concern. Since there is no central library, there should be less path depth.

As for beef number 2, it becomes a moot point with SPS V2 as document profiles (in the sense you use them) have been depriciated and the Web Storage System will most likely not be part of SPS 3 (I would say right now, there is almost no chance, but you never know with Microsoft.)
# January 7, 2004 1:28 PM

Dave Burke said:

James, that's very interesting information. Thank you so much! I'll think more about this issue and configuration options in moving forward with SPS V2/3...
# January 7, 2004 2:18 PM

TrackBack said:

# January 13, 2004 1:10 PM

TrackBack said:

# January 13, 2004 1:11 PM

21JaneFrakloop said:

Nice post imho. Keep it up!

21Jane Frakloop

<a href="californiaescortagency.com/">escorts in california</a>

# November 5, 2011 2:23 AM

MarryCamson said:

Good stuff imho. Keep posting this way!

Marry Camson

<a href="escort-bosnia.com/">escorts sarajevo</a>

# November 8, 2011 11:05 PM
Leave a Comment

(required) 

(required) 

(optional)

(required)