In the pursuit of collaborative intelligence...


...Ed Daniel's software blog

News

hacker emblem
XING
View Ed Daniel's profile on LinkedIn

.net blogroll

.net dudes

.net dudes (FR)

.rainbow dudes

Community

Humour

Open Source

Other thinking

Partners

Work

July 2005 - Posts

Custom built at Manchester University

I'm in the market for a new dev box to stick under the desk.  So besides checking out eBay I'm googling away as well.  You can imagine my surprise to find that Manchester University is now in the business of bespoke PC sales

This has got to be something that DELL should take a clear view of as if you read further you will see it's going to be very hard for me to recommend DELL from now on. 

Recently a local neighbour who discovered I was working in IT took me aside to ask for my help.  It appears that a DELL customer services rep. imparted some very strange advice to them.  My friend had contacted the customer services centre and explained they believed their DELL Dimension 4100's power supply had failed.  So what did DELL customer service say - they told them that it was no point sending it into DELL for repair as that was far too expensive and that they should find a local PC repair centre to replace the power supply.  I have no idea what the precise dialogue was but it is a terrible shame that DELL customer services pushes these types of calls away, they could have given my friend much more comprehensive advice but instead they felt it better to send them towards local cowboys - the customer services representative was not even able to recommend a reputable repair shop - it was a case of you are on your own

The local PC repair centre then proceeded to cock-up the process further by attempting to charge an exhorbitant fee and fitting a power supply that did not work causing further damage.

If DELL runs their customer service this way then it's not surprising that organisations like Manchester University will have a great proposition for potential clients.  In fact, unless I'm mistaken, we've got a nationwide network of universities across the country who could provide this service as well as train our next generation of IT support teams in the field, on site at Campus, and they can forget relying on brand name companies to qualify their work experience.   Furthermore I doubt very much these universities will be recommending users order specific extras nor install proprietary operating systems.

DELL needs to realise it's responsibility to the market otherwise better service providers will erode their market share - I wonder if the universities would co-operate to such an extent that they'd club together to buy electronic parts in bulk.  Perhaps in a networked world even the likes of DELL are now a risky investment.

648 to 14 and the 2012 Olympics

Yesterday was a good day.  London has won the bid to host the 2012 Olympics and my wife told me over dinner last night that we might be ending up with a congestion charge service for our trains now - thank goodness the Olympics will justify an improvement in our infrastructure and it makes one wonder how ,in light of that, we got to win the bid; I feel sorry for the French too - they're having a real tough time right now and the Paris economy would have dearly deserved the business the Olympics will generate.

The second good thing and the reason for this post is following up on an earlier post where I touched on the stance of the European Union in relation to software patents.  Yesterday the European Parliament voted 648 to 14 to reject the Computer Implemented Inventions Directive, a pretty major decision that affects us all.  Below are some of the links to recent coverage by the media regarding this:


American-Style Patents Won't Cross the Pond
eWeek - Woburn,MA,USA
The European Parliament overwhelmingly rejected the European Union's controversial IT ... the main coordinator of European opposition to software patents, said the ...

European Union votes out software patents by massive majority.
HTML FixIT - Grand Rapids,MI,USA
... overwhelmingly against the proposed "Directive on the Patentability of Computer Implemented Inventions." otherwise known as the software patents directive. ...

EU scraps proposal on unified software patents
MarketWatch - USA
... Parliament Wednesday overwhelmingly rejected a proposed law creating a unified way of patenting software across the European Union, effectively killing an ...

EU assembly throws out bill to harmonize patents
Reuters.uk - UK
... Siemens (SIEGn.DE: Quote, Profile, Research) and by European Union governments, which ... Party members wore yellow T-shirts with 'No software patents' written on ...

EU Rejects Software Patents Directive
Designtechnica - Sherwood,OR,USA
... rejected a proposal to create a single method of patenting software within the European Union. Commonly referred to as the software patents directive, the ...

High-tech showdown looms as EU lawmakers vote on patents
International Herald Tribune - France
... on the Strasbourg-based Parliament to argue in favor of software patents. ... proposal, which harmonizes national patent laws across the European Union and imposes ...

EU set to rule on software patents
Sydney Morning Herald (subscription) - New South Wales,Australia
A highly controversial bill on software patents faces a crucial vote in the ... aims to give a boost to technological innovation in the European Union by giving ...

EU will vote on software patents rules on Wednesday
LinuxWorld.au - St Leonards,Australia
Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) will take the next crucial step in a four-year-long battle over software patents within the European Union (EU) on ...

Patently absurd
Sydney Morning Herald (subscription) - New South Wales,Australia
... the European parliament adopted the necessary amendments to exclude software patents, but the ... regime in many ways mirrors what the European Union is debating. ...

No Software Patents !
The Software Patents Directive, as approved by the European Council of Ministers,
would codify US-style Software Patents in the European Union. ...

Posted: Jul 07 2005, 04:25 AM by Ed Daniel | with 1 comment(s)
Filed under: ,
Eclipse, Solaris, Grasshopper - so what's going on here?

It's a well known fact that if you are looking to target western businesses these days then you're going to be designing software that runs in part on the Windows desktop. While open source software such as Linux has made an impressive and never-seen-before in-road into the server operating system market prompting Sun to open their esteemed operating system Solaris (v10) there has not been much change at the desktop other than organisations moving from Windows 2000 to Windows XP.

Soon they say we should expect Longhorn. Recently it had been reported that the exec in charge of Longhorn had been given their marching orders and to be frank I'm not surprised. I've ranted twice on Microsoft blogs - the first time was over the decision to leave WinFS out and the second time was when it was discovered that Microsoft was in court yet again for patent infringements relating to core technologies being used in Longhorn. That aside though I wonder just how much this delay is going to cost Microsoft and more importantly Microsoft resellers and developers regardless of whether Longhorn loves RSS or not.

Right now we've got Scoble doing his best explaining to Microsoft employees why everyone loves RSS and what is inspiring.  We've got the IE7 team I assume/presume chained to some monolithic ball because, as several posts comment on their blog, they're so excited about stuff we've seen available for well over a year now that it's rather sad that our beloved Microsoft has taken so long to get IE7 finished and released - I do hope they're not using the CMM model to do this job especially when dudes like Charlie from nUnit tell folks Microsoft is agile.

I'm sorry to admit I find it hard to know right now what is going on - from 'degrees of separation' to telling people they're dinosaurs in the latest marketing beggars belief in how Microsoft wishes to influence decision makers about software purchasing. 

Instead what I see occurring which pains me to have to keep a careful eye on is that perhaps another strategy is underway thanks to the open source community and Microsoft submitting C# to ECMA.  Of recent news and in discussion on a variety of lists is the freebie from Mainsoft: Grasshopper. This free add-in for the VS.NET IDE allows us to deploy to Linux with Mono. The free Eclipse IDE has a Mono plug-in enabling Mono development as well. If you're really into your x-platform stuff then you'll have seen X-Develop and MonoDevelop.  We're also witnessing more and more professional and reputable models emerge in the UK for example with the type of messaging that I feel is working for software resellers and developers.

Perhaps what is happening here is a wave of new bravehearts who realise the value of the operating system / hardware is in the code available to run on it. With so much server stuff 'done' for Linux such as simplistic versions of Microsoft's SBS server in the form of SME server and a variety of other projects from Apache to MySQL and other less known things like SEDA the open source community is perhaps looking at going after the last bastion of Microsoft and essentially of ours as well - the desktop market.

In advance of the FOSS community achieving the goal of an Ubuntu distribution of Linux on the desktop we should see cunning moves that further enhance these small steps because unless I'm mistaken those who buy Microsoft and those who build Microsoft are at serious risk of having their market eroded if they are not in a position to justify the cost-benefits.  The FOSS community is preparing to court Microsoft developers away from their beloved tools with promises of just-as-good-as experiences with theirs and without all those nasty things called license fees.

I know Bill and Steve realise this - letting Microsoft employees blog has been a great step - people outside Microsoft get to see that the people who work there are just as human with all their failings as people elsewhere.  Separate to the Microsoft blogs though I was reading about team assessments and the dreaded 3.0 which while being a good and interesting revelation does show that running a big company creates some seriously unproductive interactions and a few jaded types are blogging about India taking their job from them meanwhile Bill's helping distribute wealth in a more direct fashion in the opposite direction.

So what's going to happen - that's got to be anyone's guess - Moore's law is on hold till the heat problem dissipates (lol) and nano-technologies arrive. Meanwhile the turf is software, it will be software that drives hardware sales and of course seeing Sun begin to open up their software portfolio means that selling software will become an ever increasingly skillful art - especially when your competition gives it away for free. 

Those that make their living writing software are stuck with the Windows desktop to support their income which looks like it may be on the decline if programmers move to a more appealing platform and tool sets.  The rest will have copied IBM and moved to a service-based model.  Of course this is just my opinion and musings from recent time spent reading the links I share with you above.

 

Posted: Jul 06 2005, 05:15 AM by Ed Daniel | with 1 comment(s)
Filed under: ,
Repeated research and Cambridge University
It seems people at Cambridge Univesity are advocates for open source:
 
Repeated research is a well-respected model of investigation in many sciences. Independent tests of published research are valued because they document the general applicability of results. In addition, repeated research often sheds new light on aspects of a work not fully explored in the original publication.
 
In computer science, however, it is most common for researchers to report results from testing the software that they themselves have implemented. There are many reasons for this, including the wide variety of hardware and software platforms and the difficulty transferring fragile research software to a new environment. However, without independent trials, it is difficult to establish reported experience as repeatable fact.
 
Computer systems researchers often note with dismay the number of great ideas that are not incorporated into production computer systems. We argue that encouraging repeated research is an important step towards this transfer of technology. Researchers who release their code to the open source community make a valuable step towards encouraging repeated research in computer science.
Posted: Jul 05 2005, 02:43 PM by Ed Daniel | with 1 comment(s)
Filed under:
More Posts