<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://weblogs.asp.net/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Some features I would like to see in the ASP.Net “vNext”</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/fredriknormen/archive/2009/03/26/some-features-i-would-like-to-see-in-the-asp-net-vnext.aspx</link><description>I would also like to see a template for the MVP pattern. There are so many apps using Web Forms, and most people I have talked to want to update the apps to use the MVC, which is not easy at all.. they want to do it to make it easier to write tests. By</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP1 (Build: 20510.895)</generator><item><title>re: Some features I would like to see in the ASP.Net “vNext”</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/fredriknormen/archive/2009/03/26/some-features-i-would-like-to-see-in-the-asp-net-vnext.aspx#7060490</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:43:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:7060490</guid><dc:creator>HeartattacK</dc:creator><author>HeartattacK</author><description>&lt;p&gt;In asp.net 4.0, you&amp;#39;ll have full control of the IDs and how they&amp;#39;re generated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7060490" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Some features I would like to see in the ASP.Net “vNext”</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/fredriknormen/archive/2009/03/26/some-features-i-would-like-to-see-in-the-asp-net-vnext.aspx#7005065</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 20:44:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:7005065</guid><dc:creator>Vimpyboy</dc:creator><author>Vimpyboy</author><description>&lt;p&gt;Chris&amp;#39; #2 sounds good. I don&amp;#180;t want that ClientId stuff (I prefer to have control over my id&amp;#39;s), but page specific javascripts sounds great.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would love to have something like this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://vinkr.net/1750"&gt;http://vinkr.net/1750&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7005065" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Some features I would like to see in the ASP.Net “vNext”</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/fredriknormen/archive/2009/03/26/some-features-i-would-like-to-see-in-the-asp-net-vnext.aspx#7004178</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:23:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:7004178</guid><dc:creator>Chris Brandsma</dc:creator><author>Chris Brandsma</author><description>&lt;p&gt;1. An easier way to bundle/compress custom JavaScript and CSS for Release builds.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Currently we have two options: put them all in Resource Files, and link in using the ScriptManager -- or, do it ourselves. &amp;nbsp;I&amp;#39;m OK with the DIY option. &amp;nbsp;But the Script Manager part stinks (because of all the other JavaScript it then forces on you)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. Page specific JavaScript files (*.jsx?). &amp;nbsp;In my aspx file I can type &amp;lt;%=MyControl.ClientId%&amp;gt; (or any other page value) and get the value. &amp;nbsp;But if my JavaScript gets too large I like to move it to a separate JavaScript file (also makes JavaScript unit testing possible). &amp;nbsp;When I do that I loose the &amp;lt;%= %&amp;gt; stuff.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7004178" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>