<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://weblogs.asp.net/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Research &amp;amp; Development - Or Just Development?</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/jamauss/archive/2004/03/11/88294.aspx</link><description>Something I've been thinking about lately, is the &amp;#8220;R&amp;#8221; side of R&amp;amp;D. At many technology organizations you hear about budgets for R&amp;amp;D. But what exactly happens as aspects of research? Is research comprised of proof of concept applications</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP1 (Build: 20510.895)</generator><item><title>re: Research &amp; Development - Or Just Development?</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/jamauss/archive/2004/03/11/88294.aspx#88347</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 03:56:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:88347</guid><dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator><author>Scott</author><description>IBM Alphaworks site vs. MS Research.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a target="_new" href="http://www.lazycoder.com/weblog/wp-trackback.php/30"&gt;http://www.lazycoder.com/weblog/wp-trackback.php/30&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=88347" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>