Jeff and .NET

The .NET musings of Jeff Putz

Sponsors

News

My Sites

Component Art is good stuff

If you haven't seen the beta version of the new Component Art Web.UI Suite, check it out.

I was already planning on using this stuff for the project I'm on right now, and with the addition of their new Grid control, now I'm thinking I might want to get it even for my own stuff. It's not cheap, true, but I think their new Grid control beats the snot out of the Infragistics stuff (in part because half of their site doesn't even work in Firefox). The Callback control, wrapping pretty much anything into an AJAX control is sweet.

These guys are really clever, and I look forward to seeing their source code too. Not a cheap subscription, but I think it will be worth it.
Posted: Jul 30 2005, 01:28 PM by Jeff | with 11 comment(s)
Filed under:

Comments

Marcus Mac Innes said:

Their stuff looks great, but their support is TERRIBLE. I have had massive trouble using their suite which in my opinion is made to look good and intended to be used in small "hobby sites". They continually add new modules to the suite while they leave existing modules with bugs and design flaws. My support requests have gone unanswered. Read this thread: http://www.componentart.com/forums/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=3872#5034 and many others http://www.componentart.com/forums/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=4016#4387. One guy has asked why it takes a couple of minutes to fill a tree view with 1000 nodes... Their response: Don't have so many nodes in the tree...
# August 2, 2005 4:47 AM

Jeff said:

Well if you have a tree with a thousand nodes, I don't think you're designing with the Web in mind! I wouldn't put a thousand of anything on a site.

And I disagree about the hobby site comment. In fact, it's the menu control that helped me find them, as it's used in SmartTools' SmartMail app.
# August 2, 2005 8:37 AM

Marcus Mac Innes said:

Jeff, their menu control was I believe their first control and is probably the most mature... But don't take my word for their poor support. Just check out the support forums and count the number of users who ask questions like "Is anyone there???" after reporting a problem.
# August 3, 2005 3:56 AM

Sanjoy said:

Please Let Me Know if Component Art's Tree View can be used with MCMS2002 and how about its its Browser Compatibility.

Please mail to rsan256 at hotmail
# August 22, 2005 2:52 AM

Natalie said:

Hi Guys.

Off the topic a bit, but does any one know if it's possible to add total line in the grid?

This total might not Necessarily be at the end of the grid

# August 7, 2006 9:36 AM

Ramesh said:

I am using Component Art Grid control in my project. I have defined a server template in a Hierarchical grid in which i have used a DropDownList control. My requirement is that Whenever I change dropdownlist, the record in the down level grid should get updated. My client doesn't want to use any edit item template to edit and then update. He want this to be happen, in the present item template only. When I try to achieve this, I can't find any help or resource for this components from web. Can anybody help me out for this?.

# September 24, 2006 9:53 AM

Scott Klarenbach said:

I have to disagree with the value of Component Art.  I was very enticed by the visuals and the demos on their site at first, and so I purchased the product.  However, when used in an enterprise environment, it just doesn't hold up very well.  Especially in regards to their Grid control.

It doesn't inherit from GridView, so any advanced extensions that you'd like to do are not really possible, and their support is non-existent.  I agree with the comment about hobby sites.

If you use their controls EXACTLY like the code is shown in their demos, they will work.  If you have realistic requirements with Clients asking for custom modifications to pagination, sorting, etc...you're in trouble.

Their controls look amazing, but they aren't practical for professional development.

# January 26, 2007 4:57 PM

Kitten said:

I work for a one of the three biggest isp's in SA in a department that builds massive web applications and we use component art.  Perhaps because our subscription is so massive, we have very few problems with their support, although when we started using ajax we did have a few problems getting a version out of them that didn't conflict with the ajax generated javascript.

# May 29, 2007 7:39 AM

ben said:

CA have a good range of controls and they can look fantastic, however as comments above state their support leaves a lot to be desired.  They seem to reply on the 'community' to support the software, unless you want to pay for support - which is far from swift.

I have had issued with scalability in the Grid and recently added ComboBox controls, especialyl when using AJAX/Callback functionality - also the documentation is far from complete and assumes far too much.

CA continue to add new controls to their We.UI suite without addressing the missing features and bugs in their existing and most-used controls.

However, saying that I continue to use them daily - the licensing is pretty cheap and I have some sort of 'faith' in them to deliver better products in the future.

Has anyone here also used Infragistics and can compare the two suits?

Cheers,

Ben

# October 10, 2008 5:09 AM

Rohit Nadhe said:

From last 6-7 months i have worked on ComponentArt controls.I feel like it is easy to use beacuse the good documentation provided on their site.

You can create for diffrent platforms like xp,vista,outlook all syyle sheet and code are provided on their site. as i have almost 80% of controls used.

Advantages :

1.Fast

2.Good UI

3.easy to code

4.AJAX Compatible

Regards,

Rohit Nadhe

# December 15, 2008 6:36 AM

Lyn said:

I've just started using component art and find the examples VERY limiting. Only basic info with examples that don't meet the real world situations.

Whenever anybody asks a question on the forums they are refered to look at previous published examples, never a new thought.

ComponentArt is painful to use, things that should be simple eg. Don't display grid heading just isn't simple.

# April 19, 2012 10:44 PM
Leave a Comment

(required) 

(required) 

(optional)

(required)