Jeff's Junk

The sillynonsense and .NET musings of Jeff Putz

News

My Sites

Performant is still not an adjective

From MSDN...

 "Deep Zoom enables the ability to zoom almost arbitrarily large images in Silverlight in a performant manner."

This is still the most ridiculously over-used word in tech circles, because it's made up. It can, technically, be used as a noun, but "performer" is more common. Seriously, with so many English majors writing code these days, how does this happen?

 I guess I find its use agitant. ;)

Comments

Fabrice Marguerie said:

It is an adjective in French, in which it means exactly what it's intended to mean in the quoted sentence.

I've always been wondering what's the correct word in English. Does one exist?

Should we write "speed efficient" or something?

# September 26, 2008 6:04 AM

AndrewSeven said:

I guess that means it has taken over from "do".

The excessive use of "do" in place of the actual verb drives me crazy but it seems to have become less abused in the last year or 2.

eg "I'm going to do an article" instead of "I'm going to write an article"

# September 26, 2008 8:55 AM

Jon von Gillern said:

Most words enter the lexicon in this manner, someone made will "make it up" and use the newly created word in context that other people can understand and it spreads.

Ginormous wasn't a word until someone put together "gigantic" and "enormous", but alas, people know what it means and it is in the dictionary now after being commonly used.

Is something being "performant" any more ridiculous than to "google" something else?

# September 26, 2008 9:04 AM

pho said:

In Dutch it's an adjective as well.

Even if it's not in the English dictionary, I like it. People know what you're talking about, and as stated by Fabrice, there's no better alternative that i can think of.

# September 26, 2008 9:43 AM

Jeff said:

You can't think of "efficient?"

"Deep Zoom enables the ability to zoom almost arbitrarily large images in Silverlight in an efficient manner."

Can we all refactor C# but not English? We are talking about efficiency right? Or are we?

But here's the thing, even if you were to force it into the language, what does it mean? If perform is your root, does it mean performs poorly or well? It doesn't even offer a clue as to which it is. I can't be the only person who thinks that the word makes the speaker sound ignorant and stupid.

Even if you assume it means it performs well, how so? Does it get up on the table and dance? Can it sing? Does it scale well, have great UI, work quickly or cure cancer? It doesn't mean anything.

And if we can get people to stop saying "gonna go ahead and" in demos, I'll be happy. :)

# September 26, 2008 9:53 AM

Fabrice Marguerie said:

In French, "performant" does not mean "efficient". The word for "efficient" is "efficace".

Performant is an adjective that qualifies the performance of something or someone (in French at least). Efficient qualifies the efficiency of something or someone.

Still in French, one may say that something is performant if it has a high efficiency.

# September 26, 2008 5:05 PM

Peter said:

No, that would be "leverage," every time I hear that word I feel like throwing up... like right now.

# October 1, 2008 8:28 PM

pho said:

Jeff,

Efficient has a different undertone (to me at least, maybe because of my Dutch mother tongue?).

I would use performant to describe technical things, optimized for speed and performance; whereas with efficient, I think of a well thought-out user interface...

My mind:

- Performant: technical

- Efficient: functional

It's nitpicking though, as long as everyone knows what you're talking about, right? :)

# October 3, 2008 4:52 AM

Chris said:

Well, words only become words when enough people use them to describe something.

I would guess that performant would break into webster pretty soon.

Speaking of made up words: refactor isn't a word either, but everyone uses it/knows what it means.

# October 10, 2008 2:18 PM

Matthew Ratzloff said:

Dictionaries are descriptive, not prescriptive.  All words were made up at one time or another.

# May 27, 2009 12:12 PM

boema6 said:

Well, I need it for describing a "highly performant" grain unloading equipment.  I don't believe that any word would convey the meaning as efficiently as "performant".   I am talking technology, speed, action and quality here.  I am not afraid to use it in my translation pertaining to the technical domain,  although, or maybe especially because I am a linguist.

# July 20, 2009 5:53 AM

Phil said:

Performant is not a synonym for efficient. Race cars are performant, but they are not efficient. If high efficiency cars are efficient, why wouldn't high performance cars be performant?

# November 2, 2009 3:36 PM
Leave a Comment

(required) 

(required) 

(optional)

(required)