<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://weblogs.asp.net/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Jeff and .NET - All Comments</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/jeff/default.aspx</link><description>The .NET musings of Jeff Putz</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP1 (Build: 20510.895)</generator><item><title>re: Building a live blog app in Windows Azure</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/jeff/archive/2013/04/28/building-a-live-blog-app-in-windows-azure.aspx#10305985</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 15:21:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:10305985</guid><dc:creator>Escalante</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This article provides clear idea for the new users of &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;blogging, that actually how to do blogging and site-building.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10305985" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Building for Web scale is a different skill</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/jeff/archive/2013/05/06/building-for-web-scale-is-a-different-skill.aspx#10257564</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 20:13:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:10257564</guid><dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, and shuttling half-gig object graphs (true story) around between the cache and the front-end servers is hardly efficient, or good for bandwidth.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10257564" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Building for Web scale is a different skill</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/jeff/archive/2013/05/06/building-for-web-scale-is-a-different-skill.aspx#10257025</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 16:33:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:10257025</guid><dc:creator>123456 is my password</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;There are lots of distributed and redundant cache solutions that allow you to store object graphs. &amp;nbsp;There's really no need to denormalize as a result. &amp;nbsp;Memory is cheap.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10257025" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: One interface to rule them all</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/jeff/archive/2013/04/19/one-interface-to-rule-them-all.aspx#10191936</link><pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 15:23:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:10191936</guid><dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I tend to disagree in the case of data repos and querying mechanisms. A common interface rarely helps you out here, because a) you're never swapping the concrete implementations for each other, and b) there isn't any real advantage for testing either. What I see is a lot of extraneous methods that never get used.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10191936" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: One interface to rule them all</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/jeff/archive/2013/04/19/one-interface-to-rule-them-all.aspx#10187284</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 08:44:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:10187284</guid><dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The last couple of years I found out that systems benefit greatly from having a few well defined generic interfaces that define a srt of closely related classes in the system. For instance an ICommandHandler&amp;lt;TCommand&amp;gt; for use cases, an IRepository&amp;lt;TEntity&amp;gt; as abstraction over the DAL and an IQueryHandler&amp;lt;TQuery, TResult&amp;gt; abstraction over queries in the system.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10187284" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: One interface to rule them all</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/jeff/archive/2013/04/19/one-interface-to-rule-them-all.aspx#10187068</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 07:17:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:10187068</guid><dc:creator>Mr Programmer</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Totally agreed, I do have a Comp Sci degree and some developers just like to use interfaces and abstractions for the sake of looking like they understand design patterns and OOP. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10187068" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: .NET development on a Retina MacBook Pro with Windows 8</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/jeff/archive/2012/08/30/net-development-on-a-retina-macbook-pro-with-windows-8.aspx#9930341</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 15:18:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:9930341</guid><dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Whatever the native resolution is, with Windows using 150% on the font scaling.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9930341" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: .NET development on a Retina MacBook Pro with Windows 8</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/jeff/archive/2012/08/30/net-development-on-a-retina-macbook-pro-with-windows-8.aspx#9928786</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 06:26:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:9928786</guid><dc:creator>mourhoon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What kind of &amp;quot;scaling&amp;quot; in Parallels do you use to run Visual Studio? &amp;quot;Scaled&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Best for retina&amp;quot;?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9928786" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: The burden of hiring software developers</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/jeff/archive/2013/02/20/the-burden-of-hiring-software-developers.aspx#9902462</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 23:20:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:9902462</guid><dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes. We're on the same page there. I guess I'm just simply trying to figure out how to fix the currently broken and useless IT recruiter model.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9902462" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: The burden of hiring software developers</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/jeff/archive/2013/02/20/the-burden-of-hiring-software-developers.aspx#9902195</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 20:56:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:9902195</guid><dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I didn't say anything about outsourcing a final decision. I'm talking about making the screening more efficient.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9902195" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>