My Thoughts on the Adobe-Macromedia Deal

It is pretty clear from the acquisition that Adobe is going to be making a major push into web media. They have tried a few times with tools like InDesign and LiveMotion to make some progress, but Macromedia has been extremely successful at fending off their attacks with Dreamweaver and Flash. As a result, Adobe has been able to rule the desktop publishing market and Macromedia has been able to rule the web content market. The mix of the two companies is going to make one hell of a powerful media creation beast. Ok, but that is the obvious stuff. Obviously anyone who buys out Macromedia wants Flash, because Flash is what Macromedia is all about. What else might this mean?

If you look at Macromedia's actions over the past year or so, it seemed pretty likely that they were looking for a buyer. They were gradually buying up smaller companies to add to their arsenal and make themselves more attractive to potential buyers. Choosing eHelp and Presedia as acquisitions tells me that perhaps Adobe is interested in making some moves into the super hot eLearning market. Right now, all Adobe really has going for them is PDF--which is a pretty darn valueble assest, but is really more suited for the web of the past than the web of the future. PDF was great when web pages were static, but web pages aren't static anymore and PDFs are boring these days. The next generation web is all about media, and that is where Flash comes into the picture. eHelp and Presedia were two companies in the front of the eLearning pack, and the timing of these two acquisitions is just too close to mean nothing. However, this also means that eHelp / Presedia customers are in for even more fun as their products all get jumbled up in yet another acquisition. Even Macromedia didn't continue to support all of eHelp's products...

For designers, this acquisition is definately a good thing. They get the best of both worlds as Macromedia and Adobe tag team anyone who attempts to challenge them. Developers, on the other hand, may not have it so lucky. What is to become of Cold Fusion? What about Flex? One of my long-standing complaints about Macromedia is that they don't understand developers. Surely this isn't going to be helped by Macromedia merging with an even more designer centric company. I definately trust the management at Adobe a bit more than Macromedia's management, but you can't help but realize that Adobe really doesn't have a lot of experience with developer centric software. Personally, I would have much rather seen Microsoft acquire Macromedia and give us some kick-ass next generation web tools, but they are too focused on Avalon and XAML right now, so we'll have to leave that to the Xamlon guys or get everyone running Avalon so we can deliver the stuff natively.

In any case, one thing is certain, watching this play out is going to be very interesting.

Published Monday, April 18, 2005 10:05 PM by Jesse Ezell

Comments

# re: My Thoughts on the Adobe-Macromedia Deal

Monday, April 18, 2005 5:21 PM by Ron Krauter

Nice writeup! Thanks.

# re: My Thoughts on the Adobe-Macromedia Deal

Monday, April 18, 2005 8:21 PM by Don Demsak
Jesse, you missed the whole PDF versus SVG fight going on within Adobe, and the effect Macromedia will have on this internal battle. You could possible see some very cool SVG tools built by the Macromedia folks (who wouldn't touch SVG on their own). Or it could be the death of SVG within Adobe. It could go either way.

# re: My Thoughts on the Adobe-Macromedia Deal

Monday, April 18, 2005 10:54 PM by Jesse Ezell
I find SVG vs. Flash just as interesting, if not more interesting, than SVG vs. PDF. I have a feeling there is going to be a lot of cussing soon if this deal goes through.

# re: My Thoughts on the Adobe-Macromedia Deal

Monday, April 18, 2005 11:01 PM by Christian Romney
What I find interesting is the product overlap wrt Freehand/Illustrator and Go Live/Dreamweaver.
Freehand, Fireworks, and Go Live are Dead.

# re: My Thoughts on the Adobe-Macromedia Deal

Monday, April 18, 2005 11:04 PM by Shannon J Hager
I don't think Fireworks is dead, I think it will become the next version of ImageReady. Web graphics/optimization is the only feature I know about in Fireworks, and ImageReady hasn't really been improved much in the last 5 years.

# re: My Thoughts on the Adobe-Macromedia Deal

Tuesday, April 19, 2005 11:25 AM by Kaniz
Having used both ImageReady and FireWorks, I sure hope to hell that FireWorks does not simply take the place of ImageReady. While maybe some of the optimization can be ported over to improve it in ImageReady, I /hate/ working with FireWorks.

# re: My Thoughts on the Adobe-Macromedia Deal

Wednesday, April 20, 2005 6:35 AM by Ken
Just a thought...maybe Microsoft will go against thier normal trend, turning the whole thing on its head and go for open non-proprietary standards-based formats, such as SVG and SMIL, and leave Adobomedia to closed-proprietary-based formats such as SWF or PDF. Don't get me wrong I am fan of all of the formats in the right places, so I would welcome Flash or Acrobat playing SVG/SMIL.

# re: My Thoughts on the Adobe-Macromedia Deal

Thursday, April 21, 2005 12:44 AM by Jeff
Jesse,

I don't think you have a concrete understanding of Adobe's products. InDesign is not a web production tool at all. This is Adobe's product for static print media. In using Adobe products, one realizes that all of the power comes from the complete integration of the applications. Photoshop to Illustrator to InDesign to Acrobat, it is seamless. Adding Flash to this just creates more powerful suite.

Acrobat is not dead, it is the most powerful way to present media the way it is supposed to look. What else can do this?

My thoughts on the Adobe, Macromedia deal is that is is a way to add even richer content to not only the web, but static media as well. To me, this is an obvious evolution.

Adobe needed flash. Plain and simple.

# re: My Thoughts on the Adobe-Macromedia Deal

Thursday, April 21, 2005 5:30 AM by Hans
Jeff,

I agree with you, and its something which was my initial opinion. I've read some pretty wild speculation, including John Dvorak's theories that Adobe is simply an edgy neurotic paranoid company who thinks Microsoft is out to get them (whaaaaaaaat?).

I was actuallu really happy when I heard about the acquisition (and shocked as well). But I think it will be a really good thing for the rest of us.

Adobe and Flash (and Dreamweaver, to some extent) makes perfect sense. Long live Adobe. or macrobe... :p

# re: My Thoughts on the Adobe-Macromedia Deal

Friday, April 22, 2005 5:02 PM by Jesse Ezell
Jeff, I'm definately don't claim to be expert on Adobe's products. I do however, know a lot of designers that use InDesign together with GoLive to produce web content. Perhaps GoLive would have made a better choice of product for the comparison, though I think most people got the point.

As I said in my post, it is pretty obvious that Adobe wanted Flash above all other things. However, their acquisition of Macromedia is not that simple. Adobe is not going to buy Macromedia, take Flash, and flush all of Macromedia's non-flash products and developers down the drain. The acquisition is definately going to bring Adobe into new markets and new places in the enterprise. Yes, Flash is going to be one of the vehicles for entry into these markets, but to say that Adobe bought Macromedia just so that they could use Flash in their products is an obsurd claim, since they don't have to spend 4 billion dollars to integrate Flash into their products when the file format specifications are available for free to anyone who wants them and there are plenty of Flash content SDK's out there for quite a bit less than 4 billion dollars.

# re: My Thoughts on the Adobe-Macromedia Deal

Sunday, April 24, 2005 2:20 PM by Martin Kraszewski
I am a Multimedia student who uses illustrator to create content for flash. I am expecting Adobe to create a seamless integration between illustrator drawing tools and flash, is this farfetched?
-Martin K

# re: My Thoughts on the Adobe-Macromedia Deal

Saturday, May 26, 2007 12:18 PM by kalimurzino@rambler.ru

David

# Hot blog with mustard | MikePadgett.com

Monday, June 16, 2008 11:03 AM by Hot blog with mustard | MikePadgett.com

Pingback from  Hot blog with mustard | MikePadgett.com

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(required) 
(optional)
(required)