<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://weblogs.asp.net/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>[VPC] Using Virtual PC for developer portability</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/jgalloway/archive/2005/05/07/406069.aspx</link><description>I've been using VPC quite a bit lately. At work, we've got a few applications which can take days to get set up for development - one app is ASP.NET mixed with VB DCOM on DB2, another is even more confusing. Both take a few days to configure, and that</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP1 (Build: 20510.895)</generator><item><title>Lexapro.</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/jgalloway/archive/2005/05/07/406069.aspx#6479032</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 03:03:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:6479032</guid><dc:creator>Lexapro.</dc:creator><author>Lexapro.</author><description>&lt;p&gt;Side effects of lexapro. Success stories with lexapro. Lexapro. Success with lexapro. Lexapro drug. Lexapro medication adverse effects.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6479032" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ultracet.</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/jgalloway/archive/2005/05/07/406069.aspx#6468995</link><pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 01:52:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:6468995</guid><dc:creator>Ultracet.</dc:creator><author>Ultracet.</author><description>&lt;p&gt;Is ultracet addictive. Strep throat fever how high ultracet. Ultracet. Is ultracet a narcotic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6468995" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>[VPC] Compressing VHD files</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/jgalloway/archive/2005/05/07/406069.aspx#406075</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2005 12:52:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:406075</guid><dc:creator>TrackBack</dc:creator><author>TrackBack</author><description>&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=406075" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: [VPC] Using Virtual PC for developer portability</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/jgalloway/archive/2005/05/07/406069.aspx#406079</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2005 12:33:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:406079</guid><dc:creator>Roland Kaufmann</dc:creator><author>Roland Kaufmann</author><description>We are in the process of developing a similar system ourselves. We have found that there are two obstacles for this to run seemlessly:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(1) Computer identity&lt;br&gt;Each developer has to run NewSid on the image before s/he can start using it. If one of the testers find a bug, development &amp;quot;inherits&amp;quot; that identity and the tester must start anew with another identity.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(2) Windows Update&lt;br&gt;Usually we try to do a basic Windows installation on a full disk and then let the rest be differencing disk from that one. However, there are times we would like to run Windows Update on the base image and then let the other disks be updated as well. As disk differencing is done on disk level, this would not work out in the long run.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Any thought/comments on these two challenges?&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=406079" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>