<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://weblogs.asp.net/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Joel From Canada : Team System</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/jsemeniuk/archive/tags/Team+System/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: Team System</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP1 (Build: 20510.895)</generator><item><title>Why I Love the Team System Team</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/jsemeniuk/archive/2008/10/02/why-i-love-the-team-system-team.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:52:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:6653098</guid><dc:creator>Joel Semeniuk</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://weblogs.asp.net/jsemeniuk/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=6653098</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://weblogs.asp.net/jsemeniuk/commentapi.aspx?PostID=6653098</wfw:comment><comments>http://weblogs.asp.net/jsemeniuk/archive/2008/10/02/why-i-love-the-team-system-team.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;I really enjoy being a Microsoft Regional Director and an MVP for Team System, however, I don’t think I would enjoy it as much if the VSTS team wasn’t as good as they are.&amp;#160; They ABSOLUTELY get it!&amp;#160; They have been nothing but open and engaging with “us” (the community at large) and work to continually add value to consumers of their product base on the feedback they hear (yes, they actually listen).&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;A great example of this is the Team System Power Tools – which the VSTS team release “out of stream” – working to provide customers value early and often without having for us to wait for service packs and major releases.&amp;#160; The latest example of this is detailed on Brian Harry’s blog… &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/10/01/preview-of-the-next-tfs-power-tools-release.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/10/01/preview-of-the-next-tfs-power-tools-release.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;If you are a software vendor this practice is absolutely something you should consider adopting.&amp;#160; First – listen to your customers and those who aren’t your customers (because they aren’t your customer for a very good reason).&amp;#160; Next, don’t rely on Big Harry Audacious Releases to solve problems.&amp;#160; Trickle out the value, get feedback early and often, work this value back into the core product and the world will be a happy place.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Of course, none of this works if you are a software consulting company where value is more determined by the contract you are bound to… but I’m not bitter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6653098" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/jsemeniuk/archive/tags/Team+System/default.aspx">Team System</category></item><item><title>Requirements Management with Team System White Paper</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/jsemeniuk/archive/2008/04/07/requirements-management-with-team-system-white-paper.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 03:11:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:6073732</guid><dc:creator>Joel Semeniuk</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://weblogs.asp.net/jsemeniuk/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=6073732</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://weblogs.asp.net/jsemeniuk/commentapi.aspx?PostID=6073732</wfw:comment><comments>http://weblogs.asp.net/jsemeniuk/archive/2008/04/07/requirements-management-with-team-system-white-paper.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;Requirements Management is something very near to my heart.&amp;nbsp;So, is Team System.&amp;nbsp; Wouldn't you know that there is now a &lt;A class="" title="white paper" href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=EEF7BB41-C686-4C9F-990B-F78ACE01C191&amp;amp;displaylang=en" mce_href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=EEF7BB41-C686-4C9F-990B-F78ACE01C191&amp;amp;displaylang=en"&gt;white paper&lt;/A&gt; out from Microsoft that talks about both!!!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6073732" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/jsemeniuk/archive/tags/Team+System/default.aspx">Team System</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/jsemeniuk/archive/tags/Requirements/default.aspx">Requirements</category></item><item><title>Metrics for Developers?</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/jsemeniuk/archive/2007/02/18/metrics-for-developers.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 21:48:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:1710538</guid><dc:creator>Joel Semeniuk</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://weblogs.asp.net/jsemeniuk/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1710538</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://weblogs.asp.net/jsemeniuk/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1710538</wfw:comment><comments>http://weblogs.asp.net/jsemeniuk/archive/2007/02/18/metrics-for-developers.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Check out this article by &lt;a href="http://au.sys-con.com/author/nigelcheshire.htm"&gt;Nigel Cheshire&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;- quoting both &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sam/" title="Sam Guckenheimer" target="_blank"&gt;Sam Guckenheimer&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.joelonsoftware.com/" title="Joel Spolsky" target="_blank"&gt;Joel Spolsky&lt;/a&gt; about whether or not measuring developer performance is a good thing or not.&amp;nbsp; Both Sam and Joel say to stay clear away from doing this.&amp;nbsp; Where do you stand?&amp;nbsp; Personally, I say that we need to &amp;quot;professionalize&amp;quot; our industry a bit more before we can be effective at doing this.&amp;nbsp; Tools like &lt;a href="http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/teamsystem/default.aspx" title="Team System"&gt;Team System&lt;/a&gt; make instrumentation of developers a lot easier, however I don&amp;#39;t think we can clearly understand the inter-relationship of metrics on individual developers well enough yet.&amp;nbsp; Nigel compares Sales people to Developers in this respect - asking why we can ask Sales people to hit metrics and not ask Developers to do the same. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;I think we&amp;#39;ll be there one day - however, I think the real way to measure developers is how they interact as a team - and from that measure the team by the results of that team&amp;nbsp;- in this case the software they develop.&amp;nbsp; Our industry needs to has a lot more maturing to do before we should focus on individual developer metrics, as there are likely hundreds of other aspects organizations can improve upon first that have greater value.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://au.sys-con.com/read/325131.htm"&gt;http://au.sys-con.com/read/325131.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1710538" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/jsemeniuk/archive/tags/VSTS/default.aspx">VSTS</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/jsemeniuk/archive/tags/General+Software+Development/default.aspx">General Software Development</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/jsemeniuk/archive/tags/Process/default.aspx">Process</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/jsemeniuk/archive/tags/Project+Management/default.aspx">Project Management</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/jsemeniuk/archive/tags/Team+System/default.aspx">Team System</category></item></channel></rss>