Joshua Stengel

Everything...Is going...
To be okay!

Why are all the fonts screwed up?

Today it ends...I have explained, for the last time, why "the fonts are all screwed up".  My tag clouds are coming down. Since we added a social networking site to our web services about a year ago, I been answering this question quite regularly and have staunchly supported the tag cloud as a new way to look at topics on the site.  The problem? After over a year, my users are no closer to understanding this visual concept than they ever were. 

Not only that, this morning I came to the self-realization that I don't even use tag clouds.  Nope.  Can't recall a single instance.  I look at them and admire all the pretty words, but I can't think of a single time I've every used them.  How can I expect my users to use them if I don't even use them?

So, the next question I asked myself was, "Self, why don't you use tags?"

Most tag clouds increase the font size for tags that are used more frequently.  This is useful if you are looking at a new blog and want to get a sense of the general focus of the blog.  Other than that, what's the point?

My experience has been that people expect the larger tags in the tag cloud to represent the most interesting or most important items.  That means, to make a tag cloud useful, it would need to incorporate views, ratings, comments, etc.  I suppose some kind of algorithm could be used to improve the value of a tag cloud, but would it ever answer the burning question, "Why are the fonts all screwed up?"

Comments

Steve Hurcombe said:

Why not just stop varying the font size and change the cloud into a topic list, maybe in two columns, sorted as 'top 10 topics'

Same data - more useable?

# November 20, 2007 12:55 PM

jstengel said:

Yeah, I wasn't clear...I'm doing away the "cloud" aspect but leaving the list of topics and a number count for each topic.

# November 20, 2007 1:12 PM

AndrewSeven said:

I never had any idea why the fonts were different sizes and I never asked why.

I've used them a couple times. I don't think they are pretty at all, the are working against even the most simple designs.

# November 20, 2007 1:27 PM

jstengel said:

@AndrewSeven

I think there are a lot of people like you that just put up with tag cloads.  They are just not as universally intuitive as people might think.  Thanks for the comment.

# November 20, 2007 2:03 PM

Palermo4 said:

I am a big fan of tag clouds.  I can say that I do use them.  My flickr site is a great example of that.

However... I do agree that varying the font-size is initially confusing to those new to tag clouds.  I think there are other ways to provide data.  For example, if the tag was silverlight, and there was 5 posts and 13 comments, why not have:

silverlight(5,13)

With the proper formatting, the numbers could be de-emphasized so that the main focus is the name.  Font-weight and colors could be used to indicate rating intensities.

And sorting a tag cloud by (views, posts, comments, rating) would be nice.

# November 20, 2007 2:12 PM
Leave a Comment

(required) 

(required) 

(optional)

(required)