Tobler.SoftwareArchitecture() - All Comments

Anothr feed track -Tobler.SoftwareArchitecture()

anothr user — Thu, 10 Jan 2008 07:38:31 GMT

One new subscriber from Anothr Alerts

Singles » [.NET][Articles] Single-Sign-On (SSO) for SharePoint 2007 (MOSS)

Singles » [.NET][Articles] Single-Sign-On (SSO) for SharePoint 2007 (MOSS) — Sun, 18 Nov 2007 10:08:03 GMT

Pingback from Singles » [.NET][Articles] Single-Sign-On (SSO) for SharePoint 2007 (MOSS)

[Laws] Tobler's Metrics of Civilization

Tobler.SoftwareArchitecture() — Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:54:16 GMT

Here is a gift for those who care:Tobler's Metric of Civilization

[Laws] John Tobler's Fun-duh-mental Laws and Rules

Tobler.SoftwareArchitecture() — Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:46:29 GMT

Now that I have created (or appropriated) more than one fun-duh-mental law, I am starting a list. 1.

Architect’s Linkblog » Blog Archive » 8 Links for 6/22/06

Architect’s Linkblog » Blog Archive » 8 Links for 6/22/06 — Thu, 22 Jun 2006 15:48:32 GMT

PingBack from http://asailorskis.com/arch/?p=42

re: [Laws] John Tobler's "Not About" Law

John Tobler — Fri, 21 Apr 2006 04:11:00 GMT

Hmm. Nice guys do not always finish last. That aphorism you quote is certainly not one of *my* laws! I'd rather take the chance on improving someone's day. Sure, you might run across the occasional jerk but, actually, you will usually find your random (or not so random) act of kindness is actually quite well received. How about we agree that we should help *someone*?

re: [Laws] John Tobler's "Not About" Law

AndrewSeven — Wed, 19 Apr 2006 16:46:00 GMT

Life is not about you, its about ME.

In fact most people are not thinking about you at all, ever.
They are thinking about me, my, mine, my new TV, new car, new house, my money.

Its a great ieda to break out of this consumerist pattern, but there is a reason for the expression "nice guys finish last", and that person you made smile might be stealing your credit for the good work.
Lets not worry about helping the angels, lets help the fallen ones.

re: [Laws] John Tobler's Really Readit Rule

AndrewSeven — Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:53:00 GMT

This is most difficult when you are presented with material with high levels of noise compared to the amount of signal (such as many tech books).

It presupposes that there was an attempt to write each word intellegently and thoughtfully.

re: [Laws] John Tobler's "Three Strikes" Refactoring Rule

John Tobler — Sun, 16 Apr 2006 04:45:00 GMT

Here was the comment that somehow went missing:

Sender: Jon Galloway
Url: http://weblogs.asp.net/jgalloway
re: [Laws] John Tobler's "Three Strikes" Refactoring Rule
I like it. Phil recommended a "third time refactor" guideline before, too:
http://haacked.com/archive/2005/09/19/10231.aspx
-----

re: [Laws] John Tobler's "Three Strikes" Refactoring Rule

John Tobler — Fri, 14 Apr 2006 19:13:00 GMT

The Phil Haack comment, above, referred to a comment that has subsequently been withdrawn. The URL where Phil references "the rule of threes" is here:

http://haacked.com/archive/2005/09/19/10231.aspx

Note that Phil's statement of the rule is not really equivalent to mine.