<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://weblogs.asp.net/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Does anyone find the FTP support in Whidbey counter-intuitive?</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/justin_rogers/archive/2004/07/08/176406.aspx</link><description>I'm going to start by explaining why I think it has to be counter-intuitive followed by some more general questions about the operation of the API. The WebRequest model is based around disconnected operations. Basically, no state is maintained and the</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP1 (Build: 20510.895)</generator><item><title>FTP classes in .NET 2.0</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/justin_rogers/archive/2004/07/08/176406.aspx#460943</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 22:27:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:460943</guid><dc:creator>Patrick Steele's .NET Blog</dc:creator><author>Patrick Steele's .NET Blog</author><description>&lt;p&gt;I had a chance to play around with the FTP classes in .NET 2.0 (FtpWebRequest and FtpWebResponse). My&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=460943" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Whidbey FTP Support Short - Directory List Format Support</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/justin_rogers/archive/2004/07/08/176406.aspx#180532</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2004 14:16:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:180532</guid><dc:creator>TrackBack</dc:creator><author>TrackBack</author><description>&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=180532" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Does anyone find the FTP support in Whidbey counter-intuitive?</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/justin_rogers/archive/2004/07/08/176406.aspx#177285</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2004 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:177285</guid><dc:creator>Mike Swaim</dc:creator><author>Mike Swaim</author><description>  You could try Indy. It started out as a Delphi library, but there's a .net version out as well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a target="_new" href="http://www.indyproject.org/"&gt;http://www.indyproject.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;(And you should probably still complain to MS.)&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=177285" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Does anyone find the FTP support in Whidbey counter-intuitive?</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/justin_rogers/archive/2004/07/08/176406.aspx#177174</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2004 11:19:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:177174</guid><dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator><author>Ben</author><description>I haven't had a chance to try out the new Ftp classes yet, so I can't really comment. But have you filed suggestions/bugs regarding the above issues?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The site is here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a target="_new" href="http://lab.msdn.microsoft.com/productfeedback/"&gt;http://lab.msdn.microsoft.com/productfeedback/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It seems to be the best place to voice your opinions if you want something to be reviewed and possibly changed/improved.&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=177174" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>