Kevin Cunningham - All Comments

re: ASP.NET 2.0 Web Page and User Control access using stubs

abc — Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:18:58 GMT

If a gridview is placed in a user control in the app code folder, where do the events need to be declared and defined?

re: ASP.NET 2.0 Web Page and User Control access using stubs

Muhammad Azam — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:20:20 GMT

humm... let me explore this .. wonder !!!

re: ASP.NET 2.0 Web Page and User Control access using stubs

vishal — Sat, 02 Jun 2007 12:05:55 GMT

I need help

re: ASP.NET 2.0 Web Page and User Control access using stubs

sorabh — Mon, 28 May 2007 12:02:00 GMT

It was fine

re: XBox 360 bundles

Eric Newton — Thu, 25 Aug 2005 13:20:00 GMT

Of course theres BF2:Modern Combat for XBox in November, look for me as "funkdubious" on xbox live :-)

re: XBox 360 bundles

Collin Yeadon — Thu, 25 Aug 2005 08:22:00 GMT

Bugger.. I will have to wait before I get one. I have said from the beginning that there are only 2 conditions that would make me buy another gaming system. In Microsfts case those would be backwards compatible (which they say they will have) and ZERO cost for internet game play! I pay for broadband and will not pay a dime more. I buy the games, I but the hardware, pay for internet.. what more is needed to justify them having a small expense of some servers to organize the gamers and let people meet up. (for MS that is a minor expense)

re: ASP.NET Beta 2 web sites, SCCS and Cloaking

Javier Luna — Fri, 27 May 2005 03:10:00 GMT

I believe that any DataLayer must be a simple code block, that they allow operations against DB.

That code block would not have to know on the Business Entities. Single to specialize it is to execute the operations (Store Procedures and SQL Sentences) against the engine DB (SQL, Oracle, DB2, etc.), with which this setting.

Finally, I invite to you to download the DataLayer.Primitives Public Version.

This is very cool Data Layer :)

DataLayer.Primitives - Readme!
http://forums.microsoft.com/msdn/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=1389

Cheers,

Javier Luna
http://guydotnetxmlwebservices.blogspot.com/

re: ASP.NET Beta 2 web sites, SCCS and Cloaking

Omar Khan (MS) — Thu, 05 May 2005 18:38:00 GMT

Hi Kevin,

Unfortunately we didn't have enough time to get the scenario you mention fully working for the Beta2 release. We appreciate that you are blogging about it and are sharing workarounds that users can implement for now.

You'll be glad to know that we've fixed this problem since the Beta2 release. The fix we have made post Beta2 is to not put any files that originate for Project references under source control which should address the concern you voice. You should be able to test this change in future CTPs and the final release of the product.

Please feel free to email me directly if you have more questions (omark-at-microsoft-dot-com).

Omar Khan
Lead Program Manager
Visual Web Developer

re: ASP.NET Beta 2 web sites, SCCS and Cloaking

Monsoon Dawn — Thu, 05 May 2005 15:16:00 GMT

An even better solution would be to pitch Studio integration with your SCM. That's a really nasty item to deal with on every project.

re: Ahhhh ... Different Levels of Accessibility on Property Accessors

Craig Boland — Mon, 02 May 2005 22:07:00 GMT

VB6 had that capability. It was quite useful. Since then, if I wanted to set a read-only property from outside the class, such as when loading from data source, I would implement something like:

internal SetMyReadOnlyProperty(string value){
_myReadOnlyProperty = value;
}

private string _myReadOnlyProperty = string.Empty;
public string MyReadOnlyProperty{
get{ return _myReadOnlyProperty; }
}

Thanks for the tip, K!