Martin Spedding's Blog

Adventures in a disconnected world

Plea for a locked down client PC operating system

In this blog I wanted to share some my recent .Net development experiences. Unfortunately, my .Net development today has been regularly interupted today by friends who have rung me up after being infected by MSBlast virus. I sure everyone who writes blogs here keeps there machines up to date and installs patches as soon as they become available. Sadly that seems to atypical. A lot people in Basel have broadband internet connections and don't install patches, have no idea what a firewall  and don't realise that if they don't patch their systems that will have problems. The cable internet provider does not tell people that without a firewall that they are leaving themselves open for attack.

I helped a friend remove the virus from their machine, by walking them throw editing the registry, deleting the executable from the drive and using the task manager to kill the process. Easy stuff if you are technical person but most people aren't. Within 3 minutes of reconnecting to the internet his machine was infected again. I was trying to support over the phone...I did not realise that he had not even configured the internet firewall that comes with XP. At least with XP he had that possibility. What about the system administrator I know who installed the patch a week ago on an NT 4 machine only to find that Groupshield, the program they were using for virus protection with their Exchange Server, stopped working.

I think that Microsoft needs to start selling locked down client operating systems where the absolutely minimum number of ports are open and all services that are not required are not run. Also critical patches on home systems should be install by default. I don't want to wait until Longhorn until I see that, I want it now. Everytime one these jokers distributes on these virus it progressively reduces the confidence that people have in computers. If it breaks some backward compatibility I sure it is worth it.

Comments

HumanCompiler said:

>> I think that Microsoft needs to start selling locked down client operating systems where the absolutely minimum number of ports are open and all services that are not required are not run.

They already did that...it's called Windows Server 2003...too bad the home product isn't like that, huh? ;)
# August 13, 2003 12:02 AM

Martin Spedding said:

That was the point I was trying to make. The problem is that waiting for Longhorn is too long and 2003 is a server and not a client.
# August 13, 2003 2:41 AM

Talkietoaster said:

It seems to me the QA of Microsoft leaves a lot be desired. MS sells us their products at (sometimes) enormous prices and explains them away with all the developing and QA they are involved with.

Yet within 3 months a windows2k server at my office accumulated 22 critical security patches (that's almost 2 a week, every single one of them requiring a reboot, of course). If I would run all these updates whenever they come out, I'd use all the maintenance windows planned for the next 5 years between now and the end of this year.

Under NT there was a unwritten rule that you had to reboot the systems regularily to maintain stability, clear memory leaks etc. Under w2k you seem to achieve this by having to install patches twice a week - the machine never gets a chance to become unstable ...

QA really is a problem at MS, it doesnt yet seem to be a priority however ...
# August 16, 2003 3:04 AM

Myra Wright said:

I installed Wizard Firewall and it shut down my access to the internet. Road Runner tells me it is a problem that Microsoft or Dell will have to fix. Help!
# February 24, 2004 8:14 PM
Leave a Comment

(required) 

(required) 

(optional)

(required)