Small table that compare NWAF – UIP and Maverick

NWAF

UIP

Maverick

Exclude App navigation from visual layer

V

V

V

separating business logic code from the user interface

V

V - No enforcement.

V

State management

V

V

X

Saving a snapshot of current interaction

V

V

X

Light container services (such as audit, logging and user define)

V

X

X

Define application navigation by controller return values and exceptions. Controllers calls, RV, exceptions and result actions defined in XML file.

V

X

X

separation between view and controller

V

X

V – no post back

Support ASP.NET post back

V

V

V – no separation between view and controller

Support different types of applications

X

V

X

Support Isolation levels of non visual layers

V

X

X

Provide context for classes running in isolation level

V

X

X

Support UI templates

X – support in ASP.NET 2.0

X – support in ASP.NET 2.0

V

Easy to use

V

X

V

Published Wednesday, April 28, 2004 1:43 PM by nattYGUR

Comments

# re: Small table that compare NWAF – UIP and Maverick

Wednesday, April 28, 2004 4:35 PM by Confused
What does X and V mean.

# re: Small table that compare NWAF – UIP and Maverick

Wednesday, April 28, 2004 4:41 PM by Natty Gur
Sorry,

V - exist, support ...
X - not exist, not support ...

# re: Small table that compare NWAF – UIP and Maverick

Thursday, April 29, 2004 5:14 PM by iSurge
He,where can I find a beta version of NWAF.
BTW:I cann't find one on sourceforge

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(required) 
(optional)
(required)