<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://weblogs.asp.net/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>So, what does everyone think about CTP builds?</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/ntmatter/archive/2004/12/09/279264.aspx</link><description>I ask because my content calendar is starting to get filled with CTP builds for Avalon, Visual Studio 2005, Windows Server 2003 SP1, etc. In the past we have only really published major public betas in the MSDN Subscription, now we're practically publishing</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP1 (Build: 20510.895)</generator><item><title>re: So, what does everyone think about CTP builds?</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/ntmatter/archive/2004/12/09/279264.aspx#279683</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 20:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:279683</guid><dc:creator>SmartiKat</dc:creator><author>SmartiKat</author><description>It really helps to have access to CTPs.  Or automatically enroll MSDN subscribers to major Betas will be nice too.  I found the SQL CTP extremely useful, and the VS 2005 beta usable.  From past experience, both SQL and VS's beta are way better than the existing RTM ver.  OSes Beta, however, are mostly useless until the RCs.  &lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=279683" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: So, what does everyone think about CTP builds?</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/ntmatter/archive/2004/12/09/279264.aspx#279552</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 15:34:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:279552</guid><dc:creator>Roger Bonine</dc:creator><author>Roger Bonine</author><description>The CTP builds are very useful for those of us that do long-term project planning.  Keep 'em coming!&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=279552" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: So, what does everyone think about CTP builds?</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/ntmatter/archive/2004/12/09/279264.aspx#279338</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 05:04:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:279338</guid><dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator><author>Alex</author><description>I like CTPs as well... just wish I wouldnt have to emule most of the stuff i'm interested in... don't have an msdn subscribtion&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=279338" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: So, what does everyone think about CTP builds?</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/ntmatter/archive/2004/12/09/279264.aspx#279318</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 04:07:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:279318</guid><dc:creator>Shannon J Hager</dc:creator><author>Shannon J Hager</author><description>I agree with Geoff but I think that most people expect to use a mix of products together and that it should be made a little more clear if the builds are compatible with other products or not.  I have been using the SQL Server 2005 drops exclusively so I haven't had the problems with Whidbey drops that some have had.&lt;br&gt;I definitely think the drops should continue.  The length of time we were stuck with Yukon Beta 1 was far too long.  I understand that drops are easier to coordinate later in the game but I would have been able to do a LOT more testing if we had been given more incremental drops before Beta 2.&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=279318" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: So, what does everyone think about CTP builds?</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/ntmatter/archive/2004/12/09/279264.aspx#279296</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 02:45:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:279296</guid><dc:creator>Geoff Appleby</dc:creator><author>Geoff Appleby</author><description>I think they're definately worth having. To find bugs and report them is good - to then see a report saying it's been fixed is great. To get a download not long later to see the fix for yourself is fantastic.&lt;br&gt;Also, by having a recent drop, any bugs found and reported you can be more confident that they're new and not something that's been reported 15000 times already :)&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=279296" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: So, what does everyone think about CTP builds?</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/ntmatter/archive/2004/12/09/279264.aspx#279268</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 01:22:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:279268</guid><dc:creator>Todd Spatafore</dc:creator><author>Todd Spatafore</author><description>Well, I for one really appreciate having access to these CTP's. It's great to see the progress being made and be able to provide feedback to the teams. Keep them coming, but if possible could you shuffle them off into their own tree branch? To make it more obvious which are the stable/released products and which are the CTP/Beta products.&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=279268" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>