Omar AL Zabir blog on ASP.NET Ajax and .NET 3.5

Working hard to enrich millions of peoples' lives

Sponsors

News

I was
Co-Founder and CTO of Pageflakes, acquired by LiveUniverse - founded by MySpace founder.

I am
Chief Architect, SaaS Platform, British Telecom

I will be
Chief Architect, Mi...

Follow omaralzabir on Twitter

My Public Page
www.pageflakes.com/omar

View Omar AL Zabir's profile on LinkedIn

Read my blog on:

Omar AL Zabir

www.oazabir.com



Views:

Open source projects

Munq is for web, Unity is for Enterprise

The Unity Application Block (Unity) is a lightweight extensible dependency injection container with support for constructor, property, and method call injection. It’s a great library for facilitating Inversion of Control and the recent version supports AOP as well. However, when it comes to performance, it’s CPU hungry. In fact it’s so CPU hungry that it makes it impossible to make it work at Internet Scale. I was investigating some CPU issue on a portal that gets around 3MM hits per day and I found unusually high CPU. Here’s why:

Unity_High_CPU

I did some CPU profiling on my open source project Dropthings and found that the highest CPU is consumed by Unity’s Resolve<>(). There’s no funky use of Unity in the project. Straightforward Register<>() and Resolve<>(). But as you can see, Resolve<>() is consuming significantly high CPU even after the site is warm and has been running for a while.

Then I tried Munq, which is a basic Dependency Injection Container. It has everything you will usually need in a regular project. It boasts to be the fastest DI out there. So, I converted all Unity code to Munq in Dropthings and did a CPU profile and Whala!

MunqMuchBetter

 

There’s no trace of any Munq calls anywhere. That proves Munq is a lot faster than Unity.

Comments

No Comments