Paul Gielens:ThoughtsService

another Endpoint to my thoughts

News

Syndication

Ads


Favorites

Projects

O/R Mapping Share Your Ideas for Code Camp

Frans, Alex and I are planning to meet up to discuss the content for the upcoming Code Camp. Frans will be hosting O/R mapping and Architecture, Alex LINQ and I will host the ADO.NET Orcas chalk & talk session. We think that having three chalk & talk sessions covering the architectural aspects, innovation in query API's and tooling for O/R mapping is quit unique, and see this as an opportunity for us to give you a clear picture where this technology stands today and is heading in the near future. For this purpose we want to align our sessions.

We need your input! Please tell us about any ideas that you may have for these sessions. What should the outline look like? What is a subject that should be covered? Thank you for your comments, and see you there!

Comments

Sander said:

Well, what guidance would be in order? Seems to me that all three topics discuss ways to have a business layer talk to persistent storage. Not directly but through the technology you'll be discussing.

So, do we mix and mangle the various options, choose one path and try to fit every in it? And it's easy to give an answer like 'it depends', but on what then?

With the new features Microsoft is adding to the framework, it's to be expected people get a bit lost by the various options available.

# April 13, 2007 4:34 PM

p.gielens said:

Noted, provide guidance on when to use what and why.

# April 14, 2007 6:53 PM

Waseem Sadiq said:

Hi Paul,

I would be very much interested to see how Linq to X stacks up to 'established' technologies. For instance Linq to Entities versus NHibernate.

Rationale being whether developers/architects that need to make decisions for what technology to invest in -today- should choose to go the Microsoft route or stay with the currently available products. And no I absolutely wouldn't mind to see how Linq to Entities stacks up LLBLGEN or what Frans is cooking in terms of integration capabilities :-)

Perhaps (time permitting) you guys could also discuss some of the other Linq technology positioning. Ling to Sql versus datasets, Linq to Xml versus XmLDocument/Xpath, etc.

You might kind of argue that this also falls in the guidance category.

Looking forward to see you guys talk, I'll be there.

- Waseem

# April 16, 2007 6:33 AM
Leave a Comment

(required) 

(required) 

(optional)

(required)