ActiveReports, Crystal, or Other for ASP.NET

We need to make some decisions about reporting tools for .NET, including but not limited to ASP.NET.  I know ActiveReports is very popular, and of course Crystal is common since its included with VS.NET.  I've personally never been a big Crystal fan, but I haven't used it in a long time either, so maybe its improved.  Anyone have any thoughts or experiences with these, or other, reporting tools for .NET.  I would be especially interested in developer vs. end-user customizations, and licensing issues.
Published Wednesday, September 03, 2003 8:19 AM by PaulWilson

Comments

# re: ActiveReports, Crystal, or Other for ASP.NET

I absolutely hate the process of writing Crystal Reports but they always look so good when finished and the users/management have no idea how much stress went into them, so they all love Crystal.
I'm praying for a quick release of the SQL Server reporting tools.

Wednesday, September 03, 2003 8:47 AM by Shannon J Hager

# re: ActiveReports, Crystal, or Other for ASP.NET

You should check out Report SharpShooter: http://www.9rays.net/cgi-bin/components.cgi?act=1&cid=93

Wednesday, September 03, 2003 12:08 PM by David Stone

# re: ActiveReports, Crystal, or Other for ASP.NET

Crystal Reports:
Pros:
Reliable
Plenty of Features
Cons:
They will rape you for every penny your organization has and then they'll still demand you buy more licenses.

Active Reports:
Pros:
Dirt Cheap.
Cons:
Horrificly buggy.
Terrible API.
Missing a lot of basic features.
Very very poor GUI tools.

I would kill for a decent alternative to either of them.

Summary:

You're damned if you do, damned if you don't. Screwed anyway. Why not write your reports in Java using XML and XSL:FO? I would if my employer would let me....

Wednesday, September 03, 2003 2:25 PM by Bryan Murphy

# re: ActiveReports, Crystal, or Other for ASP.NET

Wednesday, September 03, 2003 8:39 PM by Kent Sharkey

# re: ActiveReports, Crystal, or Other for ASP.NET

Stay far, far away from using the version of Crystal Reports that ships with Visual Studio .NET. It is very buggy and unreliable. If you are seriously interested in going with Crystal Reports, I definitely recommend looking into version 9.0 which is marginally better. Also, like Bryan Murphy pointed out, be prepared to fork over a fortune to pay for licenses with Crystal.

I have had good success with Active Reports, but it is really the lesser of two evils.

Also avoid the Component One reporting tool at all costs if performance means anything to you (based on 1.0).

Wednesday, September 03, 2003 11:11 PM by Anonymous (name withheld to prevent the wrath of C

# re: ActiveReports, Crystal, or Other for ASP.NET

Hi Paul,

I second Kent's suggestion, check out the beta of the MS reporting services included in SQL Server. The UI is integrated in VS.NET and it is quite a decent tool!!

Best regards,

Marc

Sunday, September 07, 2003 3:53 AM by Marc Hoeppner

# re: ActiveReports, Crystal, or Other for ASP.NET

Hi Marc,

You mean MS Reporting Services in Yukon, or it is available for SQL 2K too?

Peter

Friday, September 19, 2003 9:07 AM by Peter Holpar

# re: ActiveReports, Crystal, or Other for ASP.NET

Take a look at WordML. Server-side generation of Word documents is now very well support - even without having Word installed on that machine!

Wednesday, October 15, 2003 3:55 PM by Patrick Tisseghem

# Diogenes Revisited: Looking for an Honest Data Reporting Solution

Diogenes Revisited: Looking for an Honest Data Reporting Solution

Friday, May 14, 2004 4:03 PM by TrackBack

# re: ActiveReports, Crystal, or Other for ASP.NET

I'd vote for Active Reports. I worked with their AR2 and .Net version and both won my heart indeed. The only thing I don't like much is the Excel output.

Friday, July 02, 2004 10:18 AM by Terry

# re: ActiveReports, Crystal, or Other for ASP.NET

LogiXML .NET and web-based reporting is free now. It is a reporting system (like Crystal) rather than a reporting component (like Active Reports), but cost-wise, it is free for develpment and deployment on sigle-processor servers with a low-cost upgrade to support multi-processor servers.
Find more informtion at http://www.FreeReporting.com.

Tuesday, July 20, 2004 8:26 AM by Arman Eshraghi

# re: ActiveReports, Crystal, or Other for ASP.NET

Hi, I tried out LogiXML - I couldn't get a single report to work due to errors. Got a one liner help from their support, which was useless! Crystal Reports - their documentation is non-existent. Their Business model revolves around selling licenses and then getting things working through people trained by them alone! Don't fall into that trap. Active Reports - I've just been experimenting with. Again the bundle looks best of all the three. But then you have got to be careful of the pit falls - the product seems to be maturing .. and documentation is quite buggy and difficult to piece together. But of the three - I would prefer playing with Active Reports!!

Thursday, October 26, 2006 3:04 AM by Anantharaman

# re: ActiveReports, Crystal, or Other for ASP.NET

I'm not getting Crystal as a productive report tool. I have other users creating excel reports that are developed in short period of time and out perform any Crystal report I've seen. My issue is having to tightly couple report parameters in the report. It would be nice to create a template report and have different version based on different user parameters. The lack of native support of DB2 database is a huge issue in my office.

Tuesday, October 31, 2006 10:30 AM by TommyBoy

# re: ActiveReports, Crystal, or Other for ASP.NET

Wish I knew the answer. I have a product that includes Crystal for .NET, but it is hobbled by CR deployment restrictions. Also developing CR reports is all about knowing workarounds, very non-intuitive. ActiveReports apparently has xcopy deployment (which would be ideal for a product designed to be deployed outside of corporate intranets), uses pure C# coding (again ideal), and seems to get better subjective ratings too from users. Going to give it a try I think.

Sunday, November 05, 2006 11:24 AM by Paul Taylor

# re: ActiveReports, Crystal, or Other for ASP.NET

I use Crystal since vb3 and found at greatly powerfull and without bugs. The only concern now is that they are competing against MS and MS obviously is gonna kill them. Will they outlive version 11?

I am a novice to Active Reports and could not creat cross-tab. Is it their limitation, or my stupidity?

Wednesday, November 15, 2006 4:20 PM by Alexander Werner

# re: ActiveReports, Crystal, or Other for ASP.NET

We use Stonefield Query out of Canada...A far superior product when compared to all of the alternatives...SQL Reporting Services is free, but somewhat limited in customization. Active Reports has the worst UI I have used. Crystal Reports is the oldest and should be the most flexible, but they seem to have forgotten the latter part.

Tuesday, April 24, 2007 4:26 PM by David House

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(required) 
(optional)
(required)