<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://weblogs.asp.net/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>MS Responded to Yesterday's Post with Another Work-Around</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/pwilson/archive/2005/08/11/422305.aspx</link><description>The MS ASP.NET team has apparently heard some of our pain with web projects no longer having project files in VS 2005 and created another work-around since my last post: Closed by Microsoft on 2005-08-10 at 11:42:12 Here is an update on this bug. Based</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP1 (Build: 20510.895)</generator><item><title>RossCode.com - References in Web Projects in VS.NET 2005 		</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/pwilson/archive/2005/08/11/422305.aspx#422327</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 03:38:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:422327</guid><dc:creator>TrackBack</dc:creator><author>TrackBack</author><description>RossCode.com - References in Web Projects in VS.NET 2005 		&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=422327" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: MS Responded to Yesterday's Post with Another Work-Around</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/pwilson/archive/2005/08/11/422305.aspx#422316</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 00:51:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:422316</guid><dc:creator>Steve Hall</dc:creator><author>Steve Hall</author><description>Meanwhile, Paschal has reported a request for a VS2005 Beta 3 has been officially posted on the Feedback Center:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a target="_new" href="http://weblogs.asp.net/pleloup/archive/2005/08/12/422314.aspx"&gt;http://weblogs.asp.net/pleloup/archive/2005/08/12/422314.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I voted for it, so that they can get the web project file feature &amp;quot;done right the fourth time&amp;quot;...&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=422316" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: MS Responded to Yesterday's Post with Another Work-Around</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/pwilson/archive/2005/08/11/422305.aspx#422310</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2005 23:19:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:422310</guid><dc:creator>Steve Hall</dc:creator><author>Steve Hall</author><description>Boy, that sure looks a bit kludgey!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mewonders if they actually changed the COMPILER to do this...  Being an ol' compiler hacker, I get to say:  EEEeeewwww!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It would have been easier to implement this as a post-build rule.  Maybe that's what they really meant.  (But then...wouldn't that require a project file to store such a post-build rule?)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regardless, this might be workable.  The only side-effect is that any other tools that have to look at the target folder (that contains these new .refresh files) will now have to ignore them in some instances.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And here I thought they had sorta promised to restore the project file in whole, not just partial-functionally.  Guess they're going to kludge the tools for the advanced and enterprise developers and instead favor the beginners...  Sad!  (They claim to be listening, but are losing parts of the message during translation by some program manager or project manager.  I'm sure they'll rationalize this &amp;quot;do it right the third time&amp;quot; development technique as &amp;quot;lack of resources&amp;quot;...calling their software developers &amp;quot;resources&amp;quot; once again.)&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=422310" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>