<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://weblogs.asp.net/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Ralf's Sudelbücher</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/default.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP1 (Build: 20510.895)</generator><item><title>Aspect-Oriented Programming made easy with Event-Based Components</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2010/08/10/aspect-oriented-programming-made-easy-with-event-based-components.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 08:06:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:7586167</guid><dc:creator>Ralf Westphal</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=7586167</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2010/08/10/aspect-oriented-programming-made-easy-with-event-based-components.aspx#comments</comments><description>Aspect-Oriented Programming (AOP) can help to clearly separate concerns. But it´s kinda cumbersome to do without a tool. At least if you want to do it along the beaten path of object orientation. But things become much more easy, when you switch your...(&lt;a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2010/08/10/aspect-oriented-programming-made-easy-with-event-based-components.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7586167" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/General+Software+Development/default.aspx">General Software Development</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/C_2300_/default.aspx">C#</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/Event-Based+Components/default.aspx">Event-Based Components</category></item><item><title>Event-Based Components – For Easier Software Design Say Goodbye to the Usual Object Orientation</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2010/07/27/event-based-components-for-easier-software-design-say-goodbye-to-the-usual-object-orientation.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 07:13:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:7574228</guid><dc:creator>Ralf Westphal</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=7574228</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2010/07/27/event-based-components-for-easier-software-design-say-goodbye-to-the-usual-object-orientation.aspx#comments</comments><description>Have come to feel very uneasy with the usual object orientation. It simply does not deliver on its promises. That´s of course not the fault of object oriented languages like C# or Java or C++. It´s the fault of those who use them in a way that leads their...(&lt;a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2010/07/27/event-based-components-for-easier-software-design-say-goodbye-to-the-usual-object-orientation.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7574228" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/Application+Architecture/default.aspx">Application Architecture</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/General+Software+Development/default.aspx">General Software Development</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/C_2300_/default.aspx">C#</category></item><item><title>Doing asynchronous distributed request/response service calls without WCF</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2010/03/15/doing-asynchronous-distributed-request-response-service-calls-without-wcf.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:47:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:7384174</guid><dc:creator>Ralf Westphal</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=7384174</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2010/03/15/doing-asynchronous-distributed-request-response-service-calls-without-wcf.aspx#comments</comments><description>In my previous blog post I hopefully was able to demonstrate how low the entry barrier is to asynchronous remote communication. It´s as easy as hosting a service like this &amp;#160;&amp;#160; 10 &amp;#160; using ( var serverSpace = new CcrSpace ().ConfigureAsHost...(&lt;a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2010/03/15/doing-asynchronous-distributed-request-response-service-calls-without-wcf.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7384174" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/Application+Architecture/default.aspx">Application Architecture</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/General+Software+Development/default.aspx">General Software Development</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/Application+Space/default.aspx">Application Space</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/.NET/default.aspx">.NET</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/C_2300_/default.aspx">C#</category></item><item><title>Easy remote communication without WCF</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2010/03/15/easy-remote-communication-without-wcf.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:45:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:7383656</guid><dc:creator>Ralf Westphal</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=7383656</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2010/03/15/easy-remote-communication-without-wcf.aspx#comments</comments><description>If you´ve read my previous posts about why I deem WCF more of a problem than a solution and how I think we should switch to asynchronous only communication in distributed application, you might be wondering, how this could be done in an easy way. Since...(&lt;a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2010/03/15/easy-remote-communication-without-wcf.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7383656" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/Application+Architecture/default.aspx">Application Architecture</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/General+Software+Development/default.aspx">General Software Development</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/Application+Space/default.aspx">Application Space</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/.NET/default.aspx">.NET</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/C_2300_/default.aspx">C#</category></item><item><title>Becoming asynchronous – The first step towards distributed applications</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2010/02/21/becoming-asynchronous-the-first-step-towards-distributed-applications.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 10:41:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:7355848</guid><dc:creator>Ralf Westphal</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=7355848</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2010/02/21/becoming-asynchronous-the-first-step-towards-distributed-applications.aspx#comments</comments><description>In my previous blog post I argued WCF was not the most usable and most easy to learn way for communication in distributed applications. This is due to its focus on synchronous communication (even though you can do asynchronous communication as well)....(&lt;a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2010/02/21/becoming-asynchronous-the-first-step-towards-distributed-applications.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7355848" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/Application+Space/default.aspx">Application Space</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/.NET/default.aspx">.NET</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/C_2300_/default.aspx">C#</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/WCF/default.aspx">WCF</category></item><item><title>WCF is not the solution but the problem</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2010/02/20/wcf-is-not-the-solution-but-the-problem.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 03:43:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:7354311</guid><dc:creator>Ralf Westphal</dc:creator><slash:comments>10</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=7354311</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2010/02/20/wcf-is-not-the-solution-but-the-problem.aspx#comments</comments><description>The title of this post has caught your attention? So let me explain what I mean by it: I think WCF is great. It´s the best communication framework Microsoft ever has come up with. WCF solves a lot of problems of its predecessors, it is tremendously extensible...(&lt;a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2010/02/20/wcf-is-not-the-solution-but-the-problem.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7354311" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/Application+Space/default.aspx">Application Space</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/.NET/default.aspx">.NET</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/C_2300_/default.aspx">C#</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/WCF/default.aspx">WCF</category></item><item><title>Conscious Incompetence - The need to transcend conventions</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2008/09/17/conscious-incompetence-the-need-to-transcend-conventions.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 07:09:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:6628834</guid><dc:creator>Ralf Westphal</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=6628834</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2008/09/17/conscious-incompetence-the-need-to-transcend-conventions.aspx#comments</comments><description>In his recent blog posting Seth Godin once again questions the value of competence. Sure, he does not want to people dumber. He just argues that sole reliance on competence as a compass to navigate the future can - well - be a hindrance. He´s written...(&lt;a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2008/09/17/conscious-incompetence-the-need-to-transcend-conventions.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6628834" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/General+Software+Development/default.aspx">General Software Development</category></item><item><title>What´s in a Book?</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2008/07/25/what-180-s-in-a-book.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:58:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:6443778</guid><dc:creator>Ralf Westphal</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=6443778</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2008/07/25/what-180-s-in-a-book.aspx#comments</comments><description>As I read Kevin Kelly´s "Fate of the Book" I come to wonder what this debate he´s referring to is all about? Is it about form or content? Is is about texts as opposed to video or audio? Is it about texts of a certain minimum length and/or structure as...(&lt;a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2008/07/25/what-180-s-in-a-book.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6443778" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/English+Postings/default.aspx">English Postings</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/Publications/default.aspx">Publications</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/General+Software+Development/default.aspx">General Software Development</category></item><item><title>New blog on software architecture - The Architect´s Napkin</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2008/06/12/new-blog-on-software-architecture.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:40:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:6270516</guid><dc:creator>Ralf Westphal</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=6270516</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2008/06/12/new-blog-on-software-architecture.aspx#comments</comments><description>Since I´m mostly concerned with software architecture and my clients are asking again and again when I´m going to write a book about the topic, I finally decided to set out and compile the material to go into the book. And I decided to do it publicly...(&lt;a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2008/06/12/new-blog-on-software-architecture.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6270516" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/English+Postings/default.aspx">English Postings</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/Application+Architecture/default.aspx">Application Architecture</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/General+Software+Development/default.aspx">General Software Development</category></item><item><title>Software Architect 2008 Sample Code</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2008/06/06/software-architect-2008-sample-code.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 16:53:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:6253736</guid><dc:creator>Ralf Westphal</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=6253736</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2008/06/06/software-architect-2008-sample-code.aspx#comments</comments><description>Please find the sample code for my presentations at Software Architect 2008 on Aspect Oriented Programming with PostSharp and Software Transactional Memory with NSTM here for download: http://www.ralfw.de/download/Software_Architect_08_Samples.zip If...(&lt;a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2008/06/06/software-architect-2008-sample-code.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6253736" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/Event/default.aspx">Event</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/General+Software+Development/default.aspx">General Software Development</category></item><item><title>Component orientation explained - Modern software development viewed from a musical perspective</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2008/03/02/component-orientation-explained-modern-software-development-viewed-from-a-musical-perspective.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 21:36:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:5902749</guid><dc:creator>Ralf Westphal</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=5902749</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2008/03/02/component-orientation-explained-modern-software-development-viewed-from-a-musical-perspective.aspx#comments</comments><description>You´re fluent in object oriented programming. But now and again you´re wondering what the fuzz about component orientation is? There is supposed to be more to it than just using 3rd party controls in your user interfaces. But, what and how? Component...(&lt;a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2008/03/02/component-orientation-explained-modern-software-development-viewed-from-a-musical-perspective.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5902749" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/Application+Architecture/default.aspx">Application Architecture</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/General+Software+Development/default.aspx">General Software Development</category></item><item><title>NSimpleDB - Use Amazon´s SimpleDB data model in your applications now - Part 4</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2008/01/28/nsimpledb-use-amazon-180-s-simpledb-data-model-in-your-applications-now-part-4.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:17:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:5664779</guid><dc:creator>Ralf Westphal</dc:creator><slash:comments>9</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=5664779</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2008/01/28/nsimpledb-use-amazon-180-s-simpledb-data-model-in-your-applications-now-part-4.aspx#comments</comments><description>As explained in my previous postings , I implemented a local/embeddable version of the Amazon SimpleDB data model and API in C#. You can download the sources from my NSimpleDB Google Code Project and build the tuple space engine yourself, or you download...(&lt;a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2008/01/28/nsimpledb-use-amazon-180-s-simpledb-data-model-in-your-applications-now-part-4.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5664779" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/General+Software+Development/default.aspx">General Software Development</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/Amazon+SimpleDB/default.aspx">Amazon SimpleDB</category></item><item><title>NSimpleDB - Use Amazon´s SimpleDB data model in your applications now - Part 3</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2008/01/19/nsimpledb-use-amazon-180-s-simpledb-data-model-in-your-applications-now-part-3.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 21:05:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:5621002</guid><dc:creator>Ralf Westphal</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=5621002</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2008/01/19/nsimpledb-use-amazon-180-s-simpledb-data-model-in-your-applications-now-part-3.aspx#comments</comments><description>In my previous postings about Amazon´s SimpleDB data model and API I explained, what Amazon´s online database service - or to be more precise: tuple space - has to offer in general. If this sounds interesting to you, then now welcome to the desktop. Because...(&lt;a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2008/01/19/nsimpledb-use-amazon-180-s-simpledb-data-model-in-your-applications-now-part-3.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5621002" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/Virtual+Shared+Memory/default.aspx">Virtual Shared Memory</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/General+Software+Development/default.aspx">General Software Development</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/Amazon+SimpleDB/default.aspx">Amazon SimpleDB</category></item><item><title>NSimpleDB - Use Amazon´s SimpleDB data model in your applications now - Part 2</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2008/01/19/nsimpledb-use-amazon-180-s-simpledb-data-model-in-your-applications-now-part-2.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 08:14:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:5619000</guid><dc:creator>Ralf Westphal</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=5619000</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2008/01/19/nsimpledb-use-amazon-180-s-simpledb-data-model-in-your-applications-now-part-2.aspx#comments</comments><description>Amazon´s SimpleDB is an exciting new player in the database world. It´s free, it´s online, it´s not relational. SimpleDB is a dynamic database implementing a tuple space . Currently SimpleDB (as of Jan 08) is in beta - but not everyone can get his hands...(&lt;a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2008/01/19/nsimpledb-use-amazon-180-s-simpledb-data-model-in-your-applications-now-part-2.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5619000" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/Virtual+Shared+Memory/default.aspx">Virtual Shared Memory</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/General+Software+Development/default.aspx">General Software Development</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/Amazon+SimpleDB/default.aspx">Amazon SimpleDB</category></item><item><title>NSimpleDB - Use Amazon´s SimpleDB data model in your applications now - Part 1</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2008/01/18/nsimpledb-use-amazon-180-s-simpledb-data-model-in-your-applications-now-part-1.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:37:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:5616783</guid><dc:creator>Ralf Westphal</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=5616783</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2008/01/18/nsimpledb-use-amazon-180-s-simpledb-data-model-in-your-applications-now-part-1.aspx#comments</comments><description>Have you heard about Amazon´s online "database service" SimpleDB ? They describe it like this: "Amazon SimpleDB is a web service for running queries on structured data in real time." So it´s not a RDBMS, because Amazon does not call the data "relational...(&lt;a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/2008/01/18/nsimpledb-use-amazon-180-s-simpledb-data-model-in-your-applications-now-part-1.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5616783" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/Virtual+Shared+Memory/default.aspx">Virtual Shared Memory</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/General+Software+Development/default.aspx">General Software Development</category><category domain="http://weblogs.asp.net/ralfw/archive/tags/Amazon+SimpleDB/default.aspx">Amazon SimpleDB</category></item></channel></rss>