Sign in
|
Join
ISerializable - Roy Osherove's Blog
Unit Testing, Agile Development, Leadership & .NET - By Roy Osherove
This Blog
Home
About
Syndication
RSS
Atom
Comments RSS
Search
Go
Navigation
Home
Blogs
News
My new book is out!
The Art Of Unit Testing
Buy and read it as I write it.
I work at:
Your ad here
The Art Of Unit Testing Book
Roy's Cool Tools
Subscribe!
Subscribe to ISerializable by Email
About
Hire me
Ask me
On my bookshelf
About me
Ego trip
Roy's Tools
5 Whys - a blog for team leaders
Key.bo - a search engine wiki for keyboard shortcuts
unit testing
ruby styff
All Developer Songs
It's Time for Violence
Que Sera Sera
Articles
3: Oops! Typed Datasets
Are
scalable!
4: Introduction To Regular Expressions
5: Practical Parsing Using Groups in Regular Expressions
6: UI Threading Helper Classes
Make Your App Support Plugins 2 - Dynamic Search (MSDN)
Winforms Data Binding Lessons Learned
Make Your App Support Plugins (MSDN)
1: Introduction to Typed Datasets
2: Typed Datasets Are No Silver Bullet
My articles on MSDNAA
7: Solving VS.NET Debugger Problems
Make your log files searchable using Regex and the XML classes (MSDN)
Introduction to TDD with NUnit
Fun with Unit Tests – Testing abstract classes
New: Creating a generic Site-To-RSS tool
.Net scripting
- the practical way
Simplified Database Unit testing using Enterprise Services
Creating custom test attributes easily with NUnit 2.2.1
Cool tools every .Net Dev should be aware of
Cool Tools every .Net developer should be aware of
New: The case for staged delivery and Agile methodologies
My .Net Deep Dive lectures on video
New: Defensive event publishing in .Net, part 1
Test Feasibility Matrix
Depenedency Breaking Issues
*new* Achieving And Recognizing Testable Software Designs – Part I
Favorite Blogs
The Morning Brew
Martin Fowler
Scott Hanselman
Joel On Software
.NET Weblogs
Microsoft Israel Community
The Runtime
Daniel Moth
Oren Eini
Jimmy Bogard
CodeBetter
Dustin Campbell
Guy Kawasaki
Stephen Toub
Research @ Intel
Udi Dahan
The Typemock Insider
My Projects
Vs.Net Settings import.export Add-in
SchemaHelper - auto-detect & create data relations
Proxy handling using ProxyFactory and ProxyInfo
BackgroundWorker implementation
XtUnit: An Unofficial Unit Testing Extensibility Framework - Add new attributes to NUnit or MbUnit e
Intercetpion Application Block
Extensibility Application Block
The Regulator
VS.Net 2003 registry tweaker
My Tools page
Regular Expressions
RegEx Lib
Expresso
Regex Blogs
Sites : .Net
.Net Tools List
.NetWebLogs Forums
Winforms FAQ
.Net Debugging Resources
.Net WebCasts & Others
.NetWeblogs Archive
MSDN Magazine
Design Patterns in C#
.Net Rocks Radio
.Net Resources
Howto: .Net common tasks
VB.Net blogs on MSDN
.NetSlackers
Sites : Misc
Regular Expression Library
MSR Downloads
Win2k3 Tweak Guide
About Microsoft Interviews
Tech Interview Riddles
Feedster
Amazon Light
C:\Utils
Sites : Unit Testing & XP
NUnitASP
Tips and techniques with NUnit
NUnit
NUnit Addin
XProgramming
MSDN Mag:Simplify Data Layer Unit Testing using Enterprise Services
Tags
.NET
.Net 2.0
.Net Original
.Net Quotations
.NetWeblogs Site
Addin Contest
ADO.Net
Agile
Agile Israel News
Agile Related
altnet
altnetconf
altnetisrael
Architecture
Art Of Unit Testing
ASP.NET
BDD
Blogging
C#
CLR
Community
Community News
Cool Articles
Cool sites
Cool Tools
Extensibility
Family
FeatureFocus
Free book chapters
General Software Development
Interview
Lean
Mobile
MSBuild
NDC09-Video
Off Topic
Open Source
Other
Product Reviews
Project Management
racer
Recommended books
Reflection
Regex
Regular Expressions
review
Security
Sharepoint
Silverlight
SOA
Songs
SQL Server
tdd
Team Agile News
Team System
TechEd 05
Testing Guidelines
TestReview
Threading
Tips & Tricks
Typed Datasets
Typemock
Unit Testing
Visual Studio
web
web services
WebCast
Windows Forms
WinFX
Recent Posts
How to: Move your blog off of weblogs.asp.net (aka ‘This Blog has moved’)
test – ignore
Bounty: 500$ is you can convert my blog to squarespace
Join me for a live webinar on unit testing with Isolator++ this thursday
What’s coming in Test Lint 1.5
Archives
November 2010 (2)
October 2010 (4)
September 2010 (4)
August 2010 (3)
July 2010 (2)
June 2010 (5)
May 2010 (6)
April 2010 (6)
March 2010 (4)
February 2010 (5)
January 2010 (11)
December 2009 (7)
November 2009 (7)
October 2009 (5)
September 2009 (6)
August 2009 (21)
July 2009 (7)
June 2009 (11)
May 2009 (13)
April 2009 (5)
March 2009 (21)
February 2009 (4)
January 2009 (2)
December 2008 (5)
November 2008 (6)
October 2008 (13)
September 2008 (4)
August 2008 (13)
July 2008 (19)
June 2008 (5)
May 2008 (17)
April 2008 (11)
March 2008 (13)
February 2008 (16)
January 2008 (21)
December 2007 (8)
November 2007 (18)
October 2007 (17)
September 2007 (15)
August 2007 (19)
July 2007 (18)
June 2007 (33)
May 2007 (16)
April 2007 (10)
March 2007 (15)
February 2007 (10)
January 2007 (11)
December 2006 (22)
November 2006 (18)
October 2006 (19)
September 2006 (30)
August 2006 (19)
July 2006 (27)
June 2006 (26)
May 2006 (32)
April 2006 (15)
March 2006 (20)
February 2006 (33)
January 2006 (23)
December 2005 (22)
November 2005 (41)
October 2005 (21)
September 2005 (7)
August 2005 (28)
July 2005 (41)
June 2005 (60)
May 2005 (14)
April 2005 (51)
March 2005 (31)
February 2005 (17)
January 2005 (63)
December 2004 (45)
November 2004 (35)
October 2004 (28)
September 2004 (36)
August 2004 (21)
July 2004 (44)
June 2004 (63)
May 2004 (62)
April 2004 (78)
March 2004 (64)
February 2004 (55)
January 2004 (67)
December 2003 (34)
November 2003 (67)
October 2003 (68)
September 2003 (113)
August 2003 (56)
July 2003 (112)
June 2003 (71)
May 2003 (136)
April 2003 (52)
March 2003 (81)
February 2003 (77)
PDC pricing continued
My blog has moved.
You can view this post at the following address:
http://www.osherove.com/blog/2003/7/16/pdc-pricing-continued.html
Published
Wednesday, July 16, 2003 6:24 PM by
RoyOsherove
Filed under:
Off Topic
Comments
Wednesday, July 16, 2003 8:29 AM by
Alex Lowe
#
re: PDC pricing continued
Just because a company can afford to do something does not mean that it makes sound business sense. I'm not necessarily saying it doesn't make business sense in this case but your post seems to disregard the fact that this costs millions of dollars to put this shindig on. I would probably argue that the local sales force is a much better investment for Microsoft than this big show. So, as an investor, I want them to keep charging so the expense is low and the yield is still fairly high.
I also think you are missing the fact that the PDC is much like a technical conference (check the agenda - http://www.msdn.microsoft.com/events/pdc/agenda.aspx) so it serves as more than just a marketing blitz and thus should not be free. I mean, vendors are at TechEd and every other technical conference in the world and people don't complain about paying for those.
Wednesday, July 16, 2003 8:34 AM by
Roy Osherove
#
re: PDC pricing continued
Let me clear up some things:
1) I sholudn't be free, but it should have a human price tag
2) Becuase this *is* Microsoft, this is a special case. I'm not saying this applies to *any* company.
As for TechEd - I can see a real added value here, its mainly about teaching some stuff. This conference(just look at scobles post on the subject) is mostly networking and cool stuff.
Wednesday, July 16, 2003 8:35 AM by
Alex Lowe
#
re: PDC pricing continued
I'm also curious to know if you have ever been to a PDC, Roy?
Wednesday, July 16, 2003 8:39 AM by
Alex Lowe
#
re: PDC pricing continued
Ok, so what would the human price tag be? How would you calculate that?
No, it's not just networking and cool stuff. While that is certainly a value add to the conference it is not just that (IMHO, Scoble's response appears to be more of an informative response to let everyone know it's not *just* a Microsoft marketing blitz - just my interpretation though). Read the agenda - it is very technical and covers a great deal of the concepts in the "cool stuff".
Wednesday, July 16, 2003 8:47 AM by
Roy Osherove
#
re: PDC pricing continued
No. I've never been to the PDC, not does it look like I will get to attend it anytime soon. The price tag drives away most companies who are small.
Human price tag? 500$ max.
Sure it's not *just* marketing, but its a confernece of which its main marketing angle(which I can see) is longhorn and future products. I'll check out the schedule more closely though.
Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:00 AM by
Roy Osherove
#
re: PDC pricing continued
Looking more into the agenda, all I can see is sessions for the future versions of products,longhorn and whidbey. Yeah, its cool to see how one can develop for these, but the information there is of no real value to products being built and deployed today.
Less added value IMHO (not that I wouldn't like to be there and learn, but I don't think it's worth 2k$).
Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:02 AM by
Martin Spedding
#
re: PDC pricing continued
I decided to write a blog entry(http://weblogs.asp.net/mspedding) as a reply. I have been to a few PDC's and apart from the Hailstorm (.Net my services) they have all been excellent. Also knowing what is coming in future helps you plan. By the time they discuss something at Teched it almost yesterday's news.
Have fun and I like the way you always provoke discussion.
Martin
Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:07 AM by
Alex Lowe
#
re: PDC pricing continued
My last comment on the subject is that I agree that it would be great if the conference was much cheaper (although it would cost even more to put on then because the venue would have to be absolutely gigantic to accomodate the number of attendees - which would be a reason not to attend IMHO). I think that the PDC and some of the other conferences are things that every developer should get to do at least once in their career.
I do think that everyone is missing the financial boat here though - again, the local sales (that's account managers, evangelist, MCS architects) are a better investment because they can reach a much larger audience and in fact can provide many of these same presentations on a smaller (think user group) scale for a fraction of the cost.
Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:39 AM by
Justin
#
re: PDC pricing continued
I think Alex hit on an excellent point. If you lower the price and get three times as many attendees you need a venue three times as big, three times as many demo booths, three times as much food and swag. The cost goes up quite a bit, with economies of scale does it balance out? Maybe it does, maybe it doesn't. For $500 bucks I may consider going but even then its a tough call because I, despite my desire to be, can't be an early adopter of everything. I'm also an independent contractor, so I have little enough time as it is staying on top of the current and next 6 months technologies let alone something two years down the line. The PDC isn't for me, I'll catch the cool stuff on blogs and power point presentations. To be perfectly honest I'd feel like I was in a geek's Disney Land but really I'd probably just be taking up space.
Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:08 AM by
Roy Osherove
#
re: PDC pricing continued
No. What I want to see is the price dropped to 500$ but the amount of people staying the same. Yeah, I think Microsoft can afford it. They are doing it no less for themselves as they are for us. Well, again, its all about making developers want to use the technology at the end of the day. How much is that worth to Microsoft?
How do you calculate money loss on something as intangible as this? It only happens once a year, so make it big and loud as possible, and let people pay low prices to get in. Microsoft will only benefit from this. Let's see. 5,000 people , each paying 2000$ - that amounts to 10,000,000$. How crazy is that? Now, if everyone pays only 500$, MS only racks in 2,500,000$. You think that will *just* cover the conference? and what if it isn't? We are still dealing with the biggest richest company in the world.
Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:52 AM by
Robert Scoble
#
re: PDC pricing continued
Interesting opinions Roy. Unfortunately, how do you decide which 5000 developers are the right ones? We chose the capitalistic system instead of just inviting our friends. That way you vote with your dollars.
Make no mistake about it, the PDC is highly technical. If you're just learning to program, it will be over your head.
Wednesday, July 16, 2003 2:24 PM by
TrackBack
#
Martin Spedding's Blog
Martin Spedding's Blog
Wednesday, July 16, 2003 2:24 PM by
TrackBack
#
ISerializable
ISerializable
Wednesday, July 16, 2003 6:18 PM by
Roy Osherove
#
re: PDC pricing continued
You don't. The first 5000 win. It's that simple and that's how it usually works.
Once its full, no one else can join.
Wednesday, July 16, 2003 6:38 PM by
Roy Osherove
#
re: PDC pricing continued
Plus, It's not like your friends don't have 2k$ to pay up. Usually, they'll be the first to pay to get in. Having a lower price tag won't change that.
Friday, July 18, 2003 12:29 AM by
Paschal
#
re: PDC pricing continued
I wonder how MS consider also the media too. It's good value to have a press pass those days, to attend any kind of conferences ! It's like be a VIP.