NullObject.For<T> - As simple as it gets, but no simpler

My blog has moved. You can view this post at the following address: http://www.osherove.com/blog/2008/5/10/nullobjectforlttgt-as-simple-as-it-gets-but-no-simpler.html
Published Saturday, May 10, 2008 5:19 PM by RoyOsherove
Filed under: , , , ,

Comments

Sunday, May 11, 2008 2:08 AM by Scott Bellware

# re: NullObject.For<T> - As simple as it gets, but no simpler

Null Objects as constructor arguments are a design smell.  Detailed comment left on the original post:

www.paulstovell.com/.../nullobjectfor

Sunday, May 11, 2008 6:56 AM by Ian Horowitz

# re: NullObject.For<T> - As simple as it gets, but no simpler

What's the difference with the Dynamic Mock from Rhino Mocks ?