Unit Testing in VB.NET – with Typemock Isolator (with a free license offer)

My blog has moved. You can view this post at the following address: http://www.osherove.com/blog/2009/1/13/unit-testing-in-vbnet-with-typemock-isolator-with-a-free-lic.html
Published Tuesday, January 13, 2009 1:24 PM by RoyOsherove
Filed under: , ,

Comments

Tuesday, January 13, 2009 3:54 PM by Nate Kohari

# re: Unit Testing in VB.NET – with Typemock Isolator (with a free license offer)

No offense intended.... I understand offering free licenses for blog posts, but actually giving people the text seems a little ridiculous, don't you think? Anyone that posts that on their blog clearly is doing it just for the free copy, and not because they actually care about the product.

Wednesday, January 14, 2009 4:14 AM by Vladekk

# re: Unit Testing in VB.NET – with Typemock Isolator (with a free license offer)

@Nate Kohari

I think this is also SEO , so text is important.

Wednesday, January 14, 2009 4:19 AM by get me some typemock goodness « No More Hacks

# get me some typemock goodness « No More Hacks

Pingback from  get me some typemock goodness « No More Hacks

Wednesday, January 14, 2009 2:35 PM by Dew Drop - January 14, 2009 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew

# Dew Drop - January 14, 2009 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew

Pingback from  Dew Drop - January 14, 2009 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew

Wednesday, January 14, 2009 10:47 PM by Brian

# re: Unit Testing in VB.NET – with Typemock Isolator (with a free license offer)

You know I think this is a very good thing.  I advertise 'The Art of Unit Testing' to everyone I meet; it's been revolutionary to several people.

I also sell the heck out Typemock.  Because of a tool like Typemock I have gotten several people sold on the idea of DOING unit testing (not just saying, yeah thats sounds good in theory); many of them VB developers, but C# as well because with Typemock you're not working for the tool - the tool is working for you.  (FYI I also use RhinoMocks just as much so I don't want to hear any crap from anyone about one being better than the other or I don't know how to test - they're both tools that are a means to an end).

I believe this is a great idea and will help spread the word.  When I'm moonlighting, it's typically in VB (not C# which is my day job), and the lack of fully functional lambda expresison (along with several other features that are only in C#) drive me up the wall - this makes testing (with RM or TM) much harder.   I'm looking forward to getting this when I run the updater.

Thanks much for this!