NullObject.For<T> - As simple as it gets, but no simpler

NullObject.For<T> - As simple as it gets, but no simplerhttp://weblogs.asp.net/rosherove/archive/2008/05/10/nullobject-for-lt-t-gt-as-simple-as-it-gets-but-no-simpler.aspxThis NullObject Factory from Paul is very nice, simple and clean in its design. I really like it and I can see many uses for it, in parallel with working with your standard mocking framework or IoC Container Implementation .   here is a little usageenCommunityServer 2007 SP1 (Build: 20510.895)re: NullObject.For<T> - As simple as it gets, but no simplerhttp://weblogs.asp.net/rosherove/archive/2008/05/10/nullobject-for-lt-t-gt-as-simple-as-it-gets-but-no-simpler.aspx#6178520Sun, 11 May 2008 10:56:21 GMTc06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:6178520Ian HorowitzIan Horowitz<p>What's the difference with the Dynamic Mock from Rhino Mocks ?</p> <img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6178520" width="1" height="1">re: NullObject.For<T> - As simple as it gets, but no simplerhttp://weblogs.asp.net/rosherove/archive/2008/05/10/nullobject-for-lt-t-gt-as-simple-as-it-gets-but-no-simpler.aspx#6177985Sun, 11 May 2008 06:08:16 GMTc06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:6177985Scott BellwareScott Bellware<p>Null Objects as constructor arguments are a design smell.  Detailed comment left on the original post:</p> <p><a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.paulstovell.com/blog/nullobjectfor#comment-4856">www.paulstovell.com/.../nullobjectfor</a></p> <img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6177985" width="1" height="1">