June 2005 - Posts

Offline Folders
21 June 05 11:28 PM | russnem | 1 comment(s)

I recently became interested in the offline folders feature of Windows XP. I hadn't been very pleased with it in the past because I had several gigs of information that it would try to sync, but now I'm in a different boat. I'd like to have a single folder that I designate as "Make available offline". That way, when I work on a file in this folder from my desktop I can open my laptop, sync automatically, and be on my way for the road.

Unfortunately, when I right-click the My Computer menu option in the start menu the "Make available offline" menu is checked, but also greyed-out so I can't change it.

Can anyone help me make a single folder of my choosing available "offline"?

Batman Begins - Wow
19 June 05 11:38 PM | russnem | 6 comment(s)

I recently had the pleasure of seeing "Batman Begins" and I am so glad that I didn't wait a week. The movie was absolutely fantastic in almost every measurable sense.

I believe that the first kudos need to go to the screenwriters David S. Goyer and Christopher Nolan. Nolan also expertly directed the movie and I must say that this was the perfect team. I thought the franchise was through after that ridiculous excuse for a movie called "Batman and Robin", but my hope has now been restored.

Christian Bale did an absolutely fantastic job of portraying Bruce Wayne and Batman. I have been watching out for Bale since his incredible performance in "American Psycho" (in which he just completely floored me) and when I heard he would be playing Batman in this movie I got my first glimmer of excitement. His depth is really impressive and I'd like to submit that he is the best Bruce Wayne / Batman to date. In addition, you can just tell that his commitment to the role is absolute. I, for one, very much appreciate his hard work.

Michael Caine and Morgan Freeman both deliver outstanding performances as well, and the two were such a pleasure to watch. They brought such believability to their characters and they really helped me get immersed in the story. Adding to this was the superb acting of Liam Neeson and Cillian Murphy. It is rare that this many great actors are brought together, but indeed - it is those rare circumstances that we, as moviegoers, are treated to something special as is the case with Batman Begins.

Gary Oldman, an actor who I have admired for a very long time, did not disappoint in the slightest in his role as a young Sgt. Gordon. It never ceases to amaze me how Oldman can take roles of any size - leading or not - and turn them into something so memorable. Each line he delivers is simply perfection, and he's always been that way. Even when there are no lines to deliver Oldman hits the ball out of the park. It is for this reason that I watch every movie he is in. And, as an aside, his performance in "Hannibal" was just about the most impressive thing I've ever seen on screen.

I'd have to say that one of the most impressive actors in the movie was Linus Roache as Bruce Wayne's father. He wasn't in very much of the movie, and in many scenes didn't even have any lines. But nevertheless he gave one of those performances where he stands out and stays with you. It was really impressive to see this actor take the character of Bruce's Dad and simmer all that history down to such an impressive few moments on screen. No doubt I will be making good use of my Netflix subscription to watch some of his other work.

The one disappointment in the cast was Katie Holmes, who was clearly outmatched in this film. She simply was not able to hold her own and stand beside all the actors I've already mentioned. My first thought was that it had to do with age and experience, but then I thought of Dakota Fanning and realized that age and experience has little to do with pure talent. Unfortunately, Holmes gave a completely forgettable performance and I wasn't able to see any depth to her character at all. It was really a shame, especially when you consider that depth could have REALLY brought something special to the role that did indeed mean a lot to the film. Instead, I found myself happy that <skip the rest of this paragraph if you don't want a slight spoiler> in the end her character doesn't end up romantically involved with Bruce Wayne. Since Holmes' performance was quite inconsequential, I was relieved to find out that her character is now quite inconsequential as well.

The special effects were so good that I didn't even notice them. The realist in me knows that no director can get 10,000 bats to do what they want, but I didn't find myself saying "oh, those are all CGI".

There was clever dialog, wonderful humor, a great story, and a refreshing LACK of "star vanity" which let the greater good (in this case, the story) shine through. And THAT, in my humble opinion, is the greatest example of good film making. For the most part, a handful of truly gifted actors gave of themselves in order to achieve something great. I just have to say - WELL DONE.

This film gets an A, hands down.

GPS: Awesome! ... ?
11 June 05 11:45 PM | russnem | 1 comment(s)

I have a GPS unit that I use in my car and I have to ask people (who also use GPS when they drive or try to find a place): What county are you going to?

Such is the frustration with MY own GPS unit, which I happen to have reviewed for a magazine last year.

When I need to find an address (and I mean an EXACT address) all I have to do is use my trusted Streets & Trips 2005 or the utterly impressive maps.google.com.

Why, then, when I am attempting to drive somewhere, do I need to know what county I'm going to?

Let's think about that.

I'm willing to bet a crisp $20 bill that if 1,000 people from all over the continental US were polled they wouldn't know 2 counties that neighbored their own.

GPS software manufacturers: Get with the program. If I'm trying to get to the JW Marriot in Vegas tomorrow, I shouldn't have to fight with my GPS unit because I didn't enter the correct county. We're in a day and age when I should just be able to input "JW Marriot" and "Las Vegas" as opposed to zip codes, exact addresses, and counties.

Windows Media Player 10
10 June 05 01:06 AM | russnem | 12 comment(s)

I generally try not to make blog posts while I am upset, but this time I need to make an exception.

I have tried over the past three years or so to standardize our family's music on Windows Media Player compatible formats. This has meant resisting the purchase of songs on iTunes (which do not exist on MSN Music). It also means having to deal with disappointment when you are presented with a link that is meant to play an audio or video file in Windows Media Player and the player presents an error message telling you that it has no idea how to play the clip. Perhaps a codec is missing. Perhaps "X". Perhaps "Y". Who knows?

My point is the following. This is 2005, not 2000, not 2001, not 2002.

As a (perhaps disgruntled) proponent of Windows Media Player 10 I am of the opinion that "Windows Media Player cannot play the file" is a childish, limited, cop-out approach to take. If I have elected Windows Media Player 10 to be my choice when it comes to playing media on the web, it should play everything. Period.

There should be no discussion, there should be no manual intervention, there should be no confusion. In this day and age I should be able to play whatever type of media I want in whatever media player I choose. If iTunes plays MP4 files I should be able to play them in Windows Media Player. Sorry, team - that's just consumer reality. If I've gotten behind your player you should REWARD me with the ability to play anything from anywhere. Anything that falls short of this is simply a failure.

Does anyone have any thoughts on this or am I alone?

The Provider Model in the Real World
08 June 05 10:09 PM | russnem | 2 comment(s)

A friend of mine has his own company called Datex Media that builds real estate managment "portals". These are web sites designed to help his clients view and edit information about buildings, tenants, and vendors quickly and easily. His clients primarily use the database installed with a product called MRI, but he has a few that use Yardi and other technologies. In these circumstances, he forks the code of his real estate business logic framework into a new branch for these clients who stray from the MRI path. Obviously this opens a can of worms. Any improvements his developers made to the main code base are not realized in the branches, so work needs to be repeated.

The provider model is extremely prevalent in ASP.NET 2.0. Several features, including membership and personalization use it. While I was talking with my friend the other day it struck me that the provider model would be an extremely beneficial approach for his company. After all, it seems that he is almost always signing on new clients.

My question to those who read this revolves around the method by which a company like Datex can take their entire business framework (which, unfortunately, contains direct stored procedure calls with the SQL Server platform) and convert it to use a provider type approach whereby he could use his framework for MRI running on SQL Server or Yardi running on Access or any number of real estate packages running on other database platforms.

I have never taken on a project such as this. So much of the data retrieval code already exists in the business framework that I am nervous about something. Would sifting through the hundred classes and thousands of methods and properties to abstract out the data access be task that is worth it? Should a company that is not in a financial position at this point to fund such an undertaking throw caution to the wind and do it anyway? After all, he has gotten along just fine so far. His company makes money with every project. Why should a 400-500 hour project be considered if things are already rosey?

Any input would be greatly appreciated.

Compaq Presario Laptop Shuts Down
07 June 05 11:45 PM | russnem | 209 comment(s)

About three years ago I purchased a Compaq Presario 2700 series laptop from (I think) CompUSA. I only did this because I needed a laptop as soon as possible and therefore couldn't wait for a company like Dell to build (and then ship) one.

About a year ago this Compaq model 2715US began to shut itself down.

No warning. No reason. It would just be OFF all of a sudden. And this is a laptop that was used perhaps 2 hours a day for a little over a year.

Is anyone able to offer me any advice about this particular problem? I would love to give this laptop to my mom (in an effort to finally drag her in to the 21st century), but I can't give her something that just shuts itself off simply because it feels like it.

And frankly, may I say to Compaq: I would expect this from "High Quality Computers, Inc.". But from Compaq? You should be ashamed of yourselves.

Outlook 2003 and Images in Messages
07 June 05 01:20 AM | russnem | 1 comment(s)

I was wondering if anyone out there could explain to me how legitimate emails that I receive through my Exchange Server to Outlook 2003 would force me to right-click on images within messages to specify whether or not to download the images contained within the email, while true junk messages can download numerous pictures of erectile disfunction pills WITHOUT me having to right-click the broken image lines and choose "Download pictures".

How do they do that? How are they able to get around whatever Outlook 2003 has in place to prevent image downloads?

Thanks in advance!

Jedi Knight II: Jedi Outcast
06 June 05 12:44 AM | russnem | with no comments

A long time ago I finished the game Jedi Knight II: Jedi Outcast. It was well worth the money and I applaud LucasArts for producing the game.

I have found a number of cheat codes on the internet. These codes do a great many things. At this point, after finishing the game a second time, I was wondering if anyone knew of a way to increase all the force powers beyond level 3. I know that the cheat "setForceAll" can set all the levels to 3, but I was hoping to find some way to gain even more power just to mess with the enemies for the fun of it.

If anyone can help, please let me know!

Thanks!

Smartphone - Audiovox SMT 5600
05 June 05 07:32 PM | russnem | 16 comment(s)

Tons of people out there must have this phone by now. I've had it for quite some time and aside from the occasional "weird thing" (which a reboot fixes) the thing has been a DREAM to have.

I was wondering if anyone out there knew how to do away with all those dumb splash screens in the beginning. The phone takes about 30 seconds to start up and that is just insanity. These splash screens (which are really just more like advertisements) would be better targeted toward someone who does NOT own the phone. I already do. It's like they're trying to sell me on something that I already own.

So does anyone know how to either get rid of them or reduce the amount of time they're displayed?

More Posts