Scott Weinstein on .Net - All Comments

re: Creating high performance WCF services

Mark — Wed, 18 Jan 2012 01:28:50 GMT

I'd be interested to know your experiences Scott with regards a comparison of BasicHttpBinding and NetTcpBinding, as I have read that it is very hard to NetTcp to surpass the basic binding and I seem (anecdotal) to experience a slightly higher latency. I believe self-hosting is when it does manage to win. Does NetTcp also not share the port?

Software Architecture-Strategy for Performance tuning a .Net application « SoftArchitect

Sat, 10 Sep 2011 19:23:26 GMT

Pingback from Software Architecture-Strategy for Performance tuning a .Net application « SoftArchitect

re: Dragon NaturallySpeaking vs Microsoft Speech Recognition

bhuvanram — Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:41:03 GMT

So what u guys are saying is dragon ie good at accuracy.. but i tried microsoft SDK 5.1 thats too weak in accuracy..do we have nay open source for this voice recognition

re: Creating high performance WCF services

Etem — Thu, 09 Jun 2011 11:09:07 GMT

In terms of CPU usage, running the service with [ServiceBehavior(InstanceContextMode=InstanceContextMode.Single,ConcurrencyMode=ConcurrencyMode.Multiple)] provides extreme benefits

re: Creating high performance WCF services

Kalpesh Hingu — Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:45:12 GMT

How to use BinaryFormatter if Store procedure return DataSet to WCF. How to implement this in WCF

Creating high performance WCF services | chainding

Creating high performance WCF services | chainding — Sat, 26 Mar 2011 03:57:28 GMT

Pingback from Creating high performance WCF services | chainding

WCF ??? Improve performance with greater concurrency | chainding

WCF ??? Improve performance with greater concurrency | chainding — Sat, 26 Mar 2011 03:45:00 GMT

Pingback from WCF ??? Improve performance with greater concurrency | chainding

re: Intro to RX

Lee Campbell — Tue, 15 Mar 2011 23:54:20 GMT

Cheers Scott for the link. Post 8 & 9 are out now with 10 and 11 hot on it's heels

@Sergey: Yeah, I don't know what I was thinking with the black skin. I want to spend the spare time doing more Rx posts and then I can give it a new coat of paint.

Reactive Extensions for Javascript – Multiple observers for multiple observables | theburningmonk.com

Sun, 06 Mar 2011 16:17:34 GMT

Pingback from Reactive Extensions for Javascript – Multiple observers for multiple observables | theburningmonk.com

re: Streaming OLAP with the Reactive Extensions (RX) for .Net

scamb — Thu, 24 Feb 2011 23:55:35 GMT

Hi Scott !

This is very impressive to me, thanks!! Is there any chance, that you publish the code [the link at top of the article leads into nirvana!]?

I really would like to play with this sample a bit, to learn to understand RX better!

Thanks a lot!

br++scamb