Web Service Guy - All Comments

Funkidator rocks!

Funkidator rocks! — Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:45:47 GMT

Pingback from Funkidator rocks!

Feed Search Engine - All Fresh Articles And News Are Here

Feed Search Engine - All Fresh Articles And News Are Here — Sun, 25 Nov 2007 23:59:12 GMT

Pingback from Feed Search Engine - All Fresh Articles And News Are Here

re:RDF all the way on XML.com

TrackBack — Sun, 10 Apr 2005 06:22:00 GMT

^_^,Pretty Good!

re: Buddy Browser - Who's buddy buddy with who?

Danny — Sat, 29 May 2004 16:56:00 GMT

Sounds great, only it didn't like my browsers - both Firefox and IE6 SP1 gave :
"Sorry, Buddy Browser requires Internet Explorer 5.5 or above to operate."

re: It's official - we are not stupid!

Victor — Thu, 11 Dec 2003 20:14:00 GMT

Thanks for spotting the typo Bryce... whoops.

Actually I am now converted to the cause and running http://www.schemaweb.info/
I say converted but that doesn't mean I understand any better :-)

re: It's official - we are not stupid!

bryce — Thu, 11 Dec 2003 18:42:00 GMT

I can relate to the banging of the head feeling regarding RDF.

I'm assuming that you meant "Semantic Web" (or at least that you didn't mean "Semitic Web") in the penultimate sentence.

RE: How do you report a bug to Microsoft?

kpako@yahoo.com (Dare Obasanjo) — Mon, 15 Sep 2003 17:31:00 GMT

The easiest way is to post in one of our newsgroups such as microsoft.public.xml or microsoft.public.dotnet.xml. This particular bug is a known issue and will be fixed in the Whidbey release.

re: Web Service Definition Debate

Wes Rogers — Tue, 26 Aug 2003 16:41:00 GMT

It's usually a bad idea to define a term using the term itself (for example, "A web service is a service that executes over the web"), because it leaves the reader feeling a bit foggy. Maybe it's better to say that a web service is a program triggered to execute via an internet transaction?

re: RDF Latest News

Danny — Sun, 17 Aug 2003 14:55:00 GMT

Although I've yet to use them personally, I suspect the Collections are probably a lot easier to work with than they appear. First and rest are essentially the same as Lisp's car and cdr, which give quite a bit of that language's elegance - very neat recursion.

fyi, using the W3C's validator (http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/ARPServlet) the triples look like this :

1 genid:ARP48818 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first http://example.edu/students/John
2 genid:ARP48818 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil
3 genid:ARP48816 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first http://example.edu/students/Tim
4 genid:ARP48816 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest genid:ARP48818
5 genid:ARP48814 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first http://example.edu/students/Amy
6 genid:ARP48814 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest genid:ARP48816
7 http://example.edu/courses/6.001 http://example.edu/students/vocab#students genid:ARP48814

re: Dear Doctor DotNet

Victor Lindesay — Wed, 06 Aug 2003 14:26:00 GMT

Very true Doc. Point absorbed. Thanks for your immediate first aid.