<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://weblogs.asp.net/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Agile: Story Completion Problems</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/wallen/pages/46449.aspx</link><description>On a recent project we ran into an interesting problem &amp;#8211; or rather we ran into it at the end of every iteration and especially the end of each release. The essence of the problem was the stories were &amp;#8220;done&amp;#8221; but the customer had not signed</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP1 (Build: 20510.895)</generator><item><title>re: Agile: Story Completion Problems</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/wallen/pages/46449.aspx#2069271</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:47:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:2069271</guid><dc:creator>Tana</dc:creator><author>Tana</author><description>&lt;p&gt;I was interested in this article because as a tech writer I face a similar problem as do testers in an Agile environment... my end-user documentation Stories and/or Tasks are usually not complete at the end of each iteration... so should the Dev group be able to &amp;quot;close&amp;quot; the story or not? Sounds like your team decided that the Story had to be customer-accepted before the story was considered done... but am I reading it correctly that your solution was to have developers help out QA, and add automation where necessary, and that&amp;#39;s it? And did you dispense with the final week-long &amp;quot;release&amp;quot; iteration? So far, such a &amp;quot;hardening&amp;quot; iteration &amp;nbsp;has been my only saviour... that and a patient Dev team who allow me to carry over Stories from previous iterations. We have decided that a story won&amp;#39;t be complete until the doc tasks in it are done... but that does mean a lot of carry-overs, as you found.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;thanks for any insight, and if your tech writer(s) has any inclination to correspond, I would be very interested.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;tana&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2069271" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Agile: Story Completion Problems</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/wallen/pages/46449.aspx#87597</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2004 23:56:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:87597</guid><dc:creator>Bill Caputo</dc:creator><author>Bill Caputo</author><description>Very interesting experience report Wayne. You should consider turning this into an article.&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=87597" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Article: Agile: Story Completion Problems </title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/wallen/pages/46449.aspx#46452</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2003 23:01:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:46452</guid><dc:creator>TrackBack</dc:creator><author>TrackBack</author><description>&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=46452" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>