Follow me on Twitter at
FYI, I'm blogging most of my stuff over at More Wally now.
You might want to add my rss feed to your reader at:
Personal Opinion - Should MS back port some of the XP IE SP2 fixes to older versions of Windows? - Wallace B. McClure

Wallace B. McClure

All About Wally McClure - The musings of Wallym on Web, HTML5, Mobile, Xamarin.iOS, Xamarin.Android, and Windows Azure.


Visual Studio Magazine Column Personal Blog


Book Authors




Georgia Tech Bloggers



Personal Opinion - Should MS back port some of the XP IE SP2 fixes to older versions of Windows?

There has been a lot of talk about MS back porting part of their XP SP2 IE fixes to older versions of Windows.  I wonder if they truly should.  After all, operating systems eventually fall off from achieving support.  Here is IBM's support schedule for the AS/400 / iSeries.  How well do they support their products after the end of program support?  Take the case of Windows 2000.  How much support should one expect from Microsoft 4 1/2 years after that product has shipped?  NT4?  Its been 8 years since that shipped.  WinME?  4 years.  What about older versions of Linux?  How many major features are back ported to 2.2 or 2.4?  Microsoft is a business, they are entitled to make money.

One the other side of the coin, only about 50% of the installed base of Windows has updated to WinXP.  Perhaps MS should think about back porting some of the updates to Win2k and WinME?  Back porting would definitely be useful in securing a high percentage of systems on the internet. The change to the ActiveX downloading and the popup-blocking would be greatly recieved.

FYI, it is not my intention to start a flame-war.  I'm just posting the thoughts running through my head.  I try and keep personal opinions in my head, but this subject started my mind racing.



Scott Galloway said:

That's a very thorny issue - I guess it doesn't really make good business sense to offer free upgrades (be they bug-fixes or new features) to any product that's not currently offered for sale. Reduced rate updgrades to the latest version may make sense for many users...but again, not all. There obviously has to be some cutoff, expecting them to support say, Windows 95 9 years after release would not be reasonable in my opinion...but ME...hmm...the license cycle only expired 10 months ago (so system builders could still license new versions). What about 1 year from end of license cycle for new fixes?
# September 24, 2004 8:59 AM

Wallym said:

Should Microsoft provide more support for Windows2k and WindowsME than IBM provides for the iSeries / AS400?

# September 24, 2004 11:11 AM