<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://weblogs.asp.net/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Zeeshan Hirani - All Comments</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/zeeshanhirani/default.aspx</link><description>Senior .net Developer&lt;br /&gt;


</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP1 (Debug Build: 20510.895)</generator><item><title>re: How To do In and Like clause in Linq To SQL</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/zeeshanhirani/archive/2008/04/18/how-to-do-in-and-like-clause-in-linq-to-sql.aspx#7223612</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 11:07:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:7223612</guid><dc:creator>Ernesto</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Michel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It appears that you are trying to use Entity Framework instead of LINQ to SQL, the EF doesn't have support for Contains neither to UDF as L2Q has.... shame on MS for not including such useful features.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7223612" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Assign DataLoadOptions just before executing the linq query</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/zeeshanhirani/archive/2008/08/08/assign-dataloadoptions-just-before-executing-the-linq-query.aspx#7213663</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:03:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:7213663</guid><dc:creator>sweerbhob</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;it's pride and glory to develop first webpage using own hands :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What do you think?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.sweerbhob.net"&gt;http://www.sweerbhob.net&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7213663" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Single Table Inheritance in Entity Framework</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/zeeshanhirani/archive/2008/08/16/single-table-inheritance-in-entity-framework.aspx#7209748</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:01:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:7209748</guid><dc:creator>SamerPaul</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for this post! This is exactly what I've been looking for the past few days. Very useful&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7209748" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Using Linq To SQL With WCF Service</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/zeeshanhirani/archive/2008/05/04/using-linq-to-sql-with-wcf-service.aspx#7209191</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:26:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:7209191</guid><dc:creator>rati_ge</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I think your post is just great, but what I would like to admit is that, update method of the customer might cause some problems if object is detached from entitySet and sent over WCF to the client.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7209191" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Inheritance in Linq To SQL</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/zeeshanhirani/archive/2008/06/25/inheritance-in-linq-to-sql.aspx#7196953</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 23:46:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:7196953</guid><dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;All the null's in the DB seem to be a waste. Is there a way to accomplish the same thing without having all those null's? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7196953" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Technobabble: by AgileHead  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; Solving Entity Framework Inheritance Performance Issues, with a custom QueryProvider</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/zeeshanhirani/archive/2008/08/16/single-table-inheritance-in-entity-framework.aspx#7192089</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 17:46:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:7192089</guid><dc:creator>Technobabble: by AgileHead  » Blog Archive   » Solving Entity Framework Inheritance Performance Issues, with a custom QueryProvider</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Pingback from &amp;nbsp;Technobabble: by AgileHead &amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;raquo; Blog Archive &amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;raquo; Solving Entity Framework Inheritance Performance Issues, with a custom QueryProvider&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7192089" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: ExecuteQuery to execute dynamic SQL in Linq To SQL</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/zeeshanhirani/archive/2008/06/29/executequery-to-execute-dynamic-sql-in-linq-to-sql.aspx#7188235</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:48:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:7188235</guid><dc:creator>nima_dir</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This article is very good but this method vulnerable againist SQL Injenction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How I Can solve this &amp;nbsp;deficiency?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanx a lot&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7188235" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: How To do In and Like clause in Linq To SQL</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/zeeshanhirani/archive/2008/04/18/how-to-do-in-and-like-clause-in-linq-to-sql.aspx#7184367</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:22:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:7184367</guid><dc:creator>Michel Fornaris</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm really wonder how you made that code work!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I tried and all that I get is this exception:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LINQ to Entities does not recognize the method 'Boolean Contains[String](System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable`1[System.String], System.String)' method, and this method cannot be translated into a store expression.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any idea why that's happening to me?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Michel Fornaris&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7184367" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Many To Many Mappings in Entity Framework</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/zeeshanhirani/archive/2008/08/21/many-to-many-mappings-in-entity-framework.aspx#7184180</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:07:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:7184180</guid><dc:creator>ancalagon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;any idea how to select a list of projects that have not been assigned to a specific employee?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are Project 1, Project 2, Project 3&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IE: Employee A has Project 1 and Project 3 assigned in the Project Assignment Table&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I require the query to return only Project 2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Employee B has project 2 Assigned, I require a query that will return Project 1, Project 3&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7184180" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Many To Many Mappings in Entity Framework</title><link>http://weblogs.asp.net/zeeshanhirani/archive/2008/08/21/many-to-many-mappings-in-entity-framework.aspx#7166704</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:54:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c06e2b9d-981a-45b4-a55f-ab0d8bbfdc1c:7166704</guid><dc:creator>reka</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;i want know how to create observable collection in silverlight 3 application plz ans me&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7166704" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>