TestDriven.NET 2.0

I'm very happy to announce that TestDriven.NET 2.0 RTM is available for download. It has been a long time in the making, but is finally ready for the world!

I would like to thank Grant Drake, Sean McCormack, Eli Lopian, Charlie Poole, Lutz Roeder, Andrew Stopford and Peter Waldschmidt for giving TestDriven.NET something worth integrating with. Without these people's support TestDriven.NET 2.0 never would have made it to completion!

Below is a gallery which gives a taste of what's new:

Reflector Integration

Code Coverage with NCover or Team Coverage 

 

Your new Best Friend ;-)

Test With .NET 1.1 (from Visual Studio 2005)

 

Pluggable Unit Testing Frameworks

TypeMock.NET Integration

For information about what's new, please see the release notes included with the download. An updated quickstart and extensive documentation will be coming online soon.

Thanks to everyone who has helped get information about the new version out. Here are a few posts that cover the new functionality:

"The first picture of the page being lovely, the shank, making, the wind which it increases." - I love the Google translator! Thanks 菊池:)

If you are familiar with Digg, you might get the joke here. ;)
10 Reasons You Should Digg TestDriven.NET 2.0 - Digg Programming (1 digg...)

Let me know if you have any questions.

Published Monday, October 30, 2006 6:56 PM by Jamie Cansdale
Filed under: ,

Comments

# TestDriven.NET 2.0 is finally released

This is great news. Jamie Cansdale has finally released TestDriven.NET 2.0. In my opinion this is still

Monday, October 30, 2006 3:35 PM by Loren Halvorson's Blog

# TestDriven.NET 2.0 RTM

Jamie Cansdale has put the final hands on version 2.0 of TestDriven.NET and announced on his blog that

Monday, October 30, 2006 3:37 PM by Gabriel Lozano-Morán - The .NET Aficionado

# TestDriven 2.0 goes RTM

Jamie has released the RTM of TestDriven 2.0, congrats Jamie!

Monday, October 30, 2006 6:00 PM by Andrew Stopford's Weblog

# TestDriven.NET 2.0 RTMs

I just noticed that Jamie Cansdale has released v2.0 of TestDriven.NET. The screenshot are of the...

Monday, October 30, 2006 7:07 PM by Coding in an Igloo

# re: TestDriven.NET 2.0

Looks awesome, I can't wait to try it out!

Monday, October 30, 2006 7:31 PM by Steve

# TestDriven.NET 2.0

Jamie Cansdale has announced the release of TestDriven.NET 2.0 , go and download it.

Monday, October 30, 2006 8:02 PM by Peter's Software House

# New and Notable 118

We have a new addition to our house - a 60 pound 2-year old English Bulldog! Agile/TDD The big news of

Monday, October 30, 2006 8:15 PM by Sam Gentile

# TestDriven.NET 2.0 RTM, what are you waiting for?

In this crazy age of monthly (and sometimes weekly) CTP builds, I see that Jamie Cansdale released the

Monday, October 30, 2006 9:25 PM by Fear and Loathing

# re: TestDriven.NET 2.0

Wow Jamie !! Congrats in this big milestone and thanks for still making TestDriven free for open source development =) I cant live without it ;) Keep in the good work and good luck !! Cheers Marcos

Monday, October 30, 2006 9:43 PM by Marcos

# re: TestDriven.NET 2.0

Congratulations, Jamie! This is one of those tools that's INDISPENSABLE. I really don't know what I did before it existed. I use it multiple times a minute some days.

Monday, October 30, 2006 9:56 PM by Jason Kemp

# TestDriven 2.0 がRTMに

TestDriven 2.0 がRTMに

Monday, October 30, 2006 11:05 PM by 菊池 Blog

# re: TestDriven.NET 2.0

does this work now with the express edition IDEs?

Tuesday, October 31, 2006 7:55 AM by andre

# re: TestDriven.NET 2.0

Just installed NEW TestDriven.NET 2.0 RTM and none of my test are working when using TestDriven.NET 2.0 in VS 2005 IDE. I have the following message: "No fixture attribute on parent class." All tests working fine from MbUnit.GUI. Any ideas?

Tuesday, October 31, 2006 9:14 AM by Vadim

# re: TestDriven.NET 2.0

I'm afraid this version doesn't work with the Express SKU. I would like to say how sorry I was to remove support. Basically, Microsoft left me with little choice in the matter and I ended up conceding to their demands after the issue had dragged out for a number of months and was starting to significantly interfere with other aspects of my life. In the end, I wasn't quite up to playing David to their Goliath. Believe me I am gutted that I am no longer able to support my preferred SKU!

Tuesday, October 31, 2006 9:19 AM by Jamie Cansdale

# re: TestDriven.NET 2.0

Vadim,

Does your test project directly reference the 'MbUnit.Framework' assembly? As an optimization TD.NET only considers projects that reference this assembly for execution by the MbUnit test runner.

If this is the case you can force a reference to 'MbUnit.Framework' my adding a reference to one for the types in that assembly.

Tuesday, October 31, 2006 9:26 AM by Jamie Cansdale

# re: TestDriven.NET 2.0

Jamie, Thanks a lot for a quick reply, but I don't think I completely understand it. My test project is a separate assembly that directly reference the 'MbUnit.Framework'. I'm not sure about the last sentence where you say that I need to force a reference to 'MbUnit.Framework'. I just noticed that if I use TestDriven.NET to test the whole TestFixture, it's working fine but if I try to test a specific test in that fixture than I get the following message: 'TestCase 'MyObject.Test.Calc.Calc_Load' not executed: No fixture attribute on parent class.' And it shows that the test was skipped. Thanks again for your help.

Tuesday, October 31, 2006 10:37 AM by Vadim

# TestDriven .Net

Acaban de liberar una herramienta para Visual Studio 2005: TestDriven.Net,se ve bastante interesante....

Tuesday, October 31, 2006 11:08 AM by Compilando desde aquí y hasta allá

# re: TestDriven.NET 2.0

Nice one Jamie, That replay button is really handy dan

Tuesday, October 31, 2006 11:36 AM by Dan

# re: TestDriven.NET 2.0

Vadim, I didn't understand my reply whey I re-read it. ;)

Are you by any chance referencing 'nunit.framework' as well as 'MbUnit.Framework'?

BTW, feel free to contact me using one of these:

http://www.testdriven.net/Support_remote.aspx

http://www.testdriven.net/contact.aspx

Tuesday, October 31, 2006 11:40 AM by Jamie Cansdale

# re: TestDriven.NET 2.0

Vadim, I've just had someone else report the same issue. In their last email they said:

"After I download the lastest MbUnit MbUnit-2.3.96.exe, and reference from there. Problem is solved."

Tuesday, October 31, 2006 12:20 PM by Jamie Cansdale

# re: TestDriven.NET 2.0

Jamie,
Thanks again. I was referencing NUnit and MbUnit in the same project. After I removed NUnit reference and update MbUnit, it started working as it supposed to.

Tuesday, October 31, 2006 2:41 PM by Vadim

# re: TestDriven.NET 2.0

I have problem that resembles Vadim's: I have used Testdriven.Net to quickly run special functions, for example to manually test a piece of GUI. Since these "test"-functions are located in the same assembly as my NUnit-tests, the new version of nUnit won't run them anymore. Could you make an option to disable that optimization?

Thursday, November 02, 2006 6:55 AM by Rasmus Faber

# UnitRun - free .NET unit test runner

The kind folks at Jetbrains have just released UnitRun - a free .NET unit test runner that runs within

Thursday, November 02, 2006 2:31 PM by From the software development trenches

# re: TestDriven.NET 2.0

Rasmus,

Can you try installing the latest TestDriven.NET-2.0.1940 RTM version. You should find this fixed.

Friday, November 03, 2006 3:13 PM by Jamie Cansdale

# re: TestDriven.NET 2.0

Jamie, Very impressive release. One question though, what does Test With -> In-Proc do? Thanks, jack

Tuesday, November 07, 2006 1:38 PM by Jack

# re: TestDriven.NET 2.0

Test With -> In-Proc executes tests inside the Visual Studio process rather than using the external test process. By doing this you can get a reference to the EnvDTE.DTE extensibility object like this:

EnvDTE.DTE dte = (EnvDTE.DTE)AppDomain.CurrentDomain.GetData("DTE");

I find this more useful than using macros for spelunking the Visual Studio extensibility model. There are some COM calls that only work when called in-proc. Macros can only be written in VB.NET and are run out-of-proc.

I hope that makes sense. :)

Wednesday, November 08, 2006 2:28 AM by Jamie Cansdale

# TestDriven.NET 2.0 RTM

Some time ago I had a discussion with my colleague Alex Thissen about the differences between Visual

Wednesday, November 08, 2006 3:56 AM by Dennis' Blog

# Driving MSTest and Team Coverage using TestDriven.NET

Here is a screencast that demonstrates the MSTest and Team Coverage integration in TestDriven.NET 2.0.

Wednesday, November 08, 2006 12:21 PM by TestDriven.NET by Jamie Cansdale

# Testing With NCover/NCoverExplorer

The following screencast demonstrates how to achieve 100% coverage using TestDriven.NET 2.0, NCover and

Saturday, November 11, 2006 3:30 AM by TestDriven.NET by Jamie Cansdale

# re: TestDriven.NET 2.0

Just installed NEW TestDriven.NET 2.0 RTM and none of my test are working when using TestDriven.NET 2.0 in VS 2005 IDE.

Jim

http://www.tatvasoft.com

Monday, May 14, 2007 2:20 AM by .Net Developer

# re: TestDriven.NET 2.0

Jim,

You are welcome to use my remote assistance tool:

http://www.testdriven.net/Support_remote.aspx

Or contact me directly:

http://www.testdriven.net/contact.aspx

I will find out what the problem is.

Thanks, Jamie.

Monday, May 14, 2007 4:46 AM by Jamie Cansdale

# New and Notable 118

We have a new addition to our house - a 60 pound 2-year old English Bulldog! Agile/TDD The big news of

Tuesday, September 25, 2007 3:02 AM by Sam Gentile

# links for 2007-10-10 « dstelow notes…

Pingback from  links for 2007-10-10 « dstelow notes…

Wednesday, October 10, 2007 7:40 PM by links for 2007-10-10 « dstelow notes…

# re: TestDriven.NET 2.0

when is the next version release coming out

Sunday, February 24, 2008 9:24 PM by debbiegal

# dottrace

Pingback from  dottrace

Wednesday, April 16, 2008 10:10 PM by dottrace

# TestDriven.NET 2.0 Has Shipped!

TestDriven.NET 2.0 Has Shipped!

Sunday, July 06, 2008 5:17 PM by Geek Noise

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(required) 
(optional)
(required)