help.net


Musing on .Net

News





hit counters




Open source CMS

Technorati

My blog

Irish blogs

Locations of visitors to this page Get Chitika eMiniMalls

.Net useful

Blogs I read

PocketPC

SQL

Usability

Can Atlas be compatible with Asp.Net 1.1?

Maybe I should address this to Scott Guthrie, but a lot of web developers I am sure are still using the .Net framework 1.1. Any chance we can use Atlas then?

Of course I can use an Ajax library but Atlas will bring a good solution when I am ready to migrate some of my projects to .Net 2.0.

 

Posted: Apr 05 2006, 05:27 PM by help.net | with 6 comment(s)
Filed under: ,

Comments

scottgu said:

You can definitely use the Atlas Client-Side libraries with ASP.NET V1.1 today. Shanku actually posted a sample that shows how to use it even with PHP: http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2006/04/05/441973.aspx

Hope this helps,

Scott
# April 5, 2006 12:40 PM

Jackal said:

I wish I could migrate to .NET 2.0. but I have found Visual Studio 2005 just to unstable.... I am waiting for that first Service Pack then the Atlas stuff might interest me.
# April 5, 2006 1:29 PM

AndrewSeven said:

I would prefer "Out with the old, in with the new!", but if it can work with PHP on the server, sure some poor soul could make it work with asp classic.

# April 5, 2006 1:30 PM

Hannes Preishuber said:

asp.net 1.1 should be definitly not used any more.
2.0 is so much better and more productive...
# April 5, 2006 2:00 PM

Dion said:

If you're looking for a kind of UpdatePanel for .NET 1.1, then try magicajax (http://www.magicajax.net). It's a kind of opensource UpdatePanel framework (although works differently).
# April 5, 2006 2:17 PM

Michael Schwarz said:

I have a modified version of Ajax.NET running with the Atlas Client-Side libraries on .NET 1.1, I think it is not a big thing to run some parts on the 1.1 version. If you start a new project you should use the new ASP.NET 2.0, you have a lot of new stuff there that will help you to save time developing your web applications. I know that there are some bugs in the Visual Studio .NET 2005, but there are bugs in the old one, too.

Michael
# April 5, 2006 3:11 PM