XmlConverter for .NET Objects

Tuesday, January 13, 2004

In this new era, is very important the easy understanding of data transfer. For this reason Devshock developed the XmlConverter tool that hides the complexity of the serialization and deserialization of objects.
Xml serialization and deserialization is a very useful tool of the .NET framework that permit us the creation of any kind of objects, convert it to XML (Extensible Markup Language) for the easy manipulation, but in some cases is complex to use.
Now forget of complex translations and just say "Convert this object to XML" or "Convert this XML to this Object"... sound easy no?
Use it too for load configuration from files

Assembly Properties

Written fully in C#, 100% manage code.
XML conversion from String and StringBuilder source
Easy conversion of objects
All functions are static (Shared in Visual Basic), so don't need to make a new instance of the XmlConvert
Support thousands of conversions in seconds
Very useful for data transfer in Server/Client applications
Convert any type of objects including images
[DevShock.com]

I'll be trying this out later tonight, and I'll let you know how it works out. It's free, so you can't beat it.

5 Comments

hey, how about putting that through babelfish and translating it to english ;)

Addy Santo - Tuesday, January 13, 2004 12:40:00 AM

Inhow far is this usefull besides XmlSerialization?

I make hefty use of the XmlSerializer to serialize/deserialize all kinds of configuration files and other stuff in this area, and so far I always found it fits my ned (for pure DTO's - there are some stupid things in it, as not using reflection [only public variables], choking on interfaces and stuff like this).

I mean, am I missing something grave? It does not look like from the description, so mybe you could shed some light.

Thomas Tomiczek - Tuesday, January 13, 2004 7:39:00 AM

I don't know yet. I'll be evaluating it shortly.

Robert McLaws - Tuesday, January 13, 2004 9:56:00 AM

"Inhow far is this usefull besides XmlSerialization?"

No more no less, it appears to be a *very* light wrapper for the same.

Bored Decompiler - Tuesday, January 13, 2004 12:08:00 PM

looks simple.. not much docs needed..:)

SBC - Wednesday, January 28, 2004 4:51:00 AM

Comments have been disabled for this content.