Unit Testing, Agile Development, Leadership & .NET - By Roy Osherove
I've asked my lead what the hell 'MVP code of conduct' means, because I certainly don't know what it is.
If what you suggest is true, it's a major blow for the MVP program. People should be awarded for their community work, and if that work is noteworthy, they should get the reward. I mean, they also awarded an ad-ware seller. Was that a good move? I don't know, but is that of any particular relevance, not according to me.
I use testdriven.net every day and I like it. That doesn't mean the author of the tool should get an MVP status per se, but it sure doesn't mean the MVP title should be withdrawn because of it as well, especially because he IS a community leader.
Recently there weresome news about Microsoft MVP program. Some known names such as James Cansdale, Paul
This bothers me. Both as an MVP and a daily user of TestDriven.NET. It's a fantastic tool and it's one of those rare tools that's on my list of "install always and everywhere". I totally disagree wtih MS on this and think they made a mistake. The fact that Jaimie figured out how to get free tools running with the free IDE and made it available, is stellar. While I understand MS took a position that they didn't want people building addins for the express SKUs, I think it's wrong to chastise people for it. I'm sure if Roland and his excellent GhostDoc tool had the same exposure that TD.NET did, he might be facing a cease and decist notice as well. It's sad that MS takes this approach with people that make contributions to the community. Now I'm afraid that since I built a better mousetrap for SharePoint (my SharePoint forums) will I get looked down as a guy who doesn't play well with others and sent to the minors? Bad decision on MS and I'm sure this isn't the last we've heard of it.
There have been a few MVP efforts over the years that I find silly. Various petitions about VB6, mass