1 Comment

  • Its all very changing chips but its a real pain in the #$%& backside to program intel chips anway. Who wants to relearn allover again, after all steve jobs should know good and well. If he wanted something to change to he shouldhaveheaded down the amd road, much simpler solution and much more risc oriented cpu. Games business and otherwise intel cpu and especially there new incarnation making the chips lowervoltage was one thing but then to go and put that reduculous heatsink and fancombination on it where one has the risk of breaking the motherboards when mounting it rediculous. Should rethink this.

    Also there past builds, where they have been only forward optimized whereas amd have been always backwards compatable should be enough for anyone.

    And the fact that power pc are superior anyways why change anyways, as in previous history it is not always beneficial to change hardware when things are working fine. Yes its nice to change to a new thing but intel have a monopolyu with microsoft and its just another nail in the coffin of amd and ppc cpu`s.

    Talk about unfair tactics. Onbe would almost thing steve jobs has quite alot more shares in microsoft? perhaps even more than we know?

    Interesting we have not seen the 2004 officeforthe windows platform yet even still? Whats next for us all.

    And I also think the quesation is, when the cell chip is so close why would steve not look at that instead as its ibm`sbaby in a way too, and far superior to anything? Id rather continue on with the current line of apple and then design around that cpu if one had the resources?

    Strange times ahead.

Comments have been disabled for this content.