Why I Use Visual Studio.NET

11 Comments

• Valid in what sense? ;)
  
  
  
  
  
  no really, same here...VS.NET all the way! :D
  

• valid as in tags that are opened and closed properly.
  

• gotchya...just wanted to make sure you weren't talking about XHTML valid or anything like that ;)
  

• ROFLMAO! Best comeback I've run across in quite some time.
  

• That's pretty funny. Keen observation.
  

• touche! Good catch. I had to look at it for about 10 seconds before I saw that extra >
  

• Actually, while I use VS.NET, it doesn't always spit out well-formed HTML :)
  

• I've never seen an instance where it does not open and close tags properly.
  

• HA! (that's a very honest compliment on your wonderfully laden sarcasm - love the rip on the ad image. too cool)
  

• I agree with using VS.NET for doing basic layout and any heavy asp.net lifting and page design, however if you want to make use of the power of CSS Dreamweaver can't be touched. I wish that VS.NET would have a decent interface for working on the look part of the site however it doesn't and one has to resort to tools like Dreamweaver. The one caveat is DW does a fair job handling asp.net tags, it is usable but not to the level of VS.NET.
  

• All great comments, but Greg, you are not looking very hard at the graphic.